Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

183 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

High Court

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Lack of Counterclaim. The award was found patently illegal as it granted compensation to an investor who had not filed any claim or counterclaim, based on a misconception from conciliation proceedings.

17 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a stockbroker's operational error in handling a Margin Trading Facility account for an investor, leading to the auction of shar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition to Restore Suit Dismissed for Default, Setting Aside Order That Rejected Restoration on Ground of Arbitration Agreement. Court holds that dismissal for default does not bar restoration and that the trial court must decide the application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on merits.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioner, K. M. Dastagir Sab, filed a suit (O.S.No.1280/2020) before the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, seeking rel...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arbitration Proceedings in Chit Fund Dispute for Lack of Jurisdiction. Arbitration Clause in Chit Fund Agreement Not Binding as Chit Fund Act Overrides Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

18 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Sri H.B. Shivakumar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash arbitration procee...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Review Petition with 1495 Days Delay in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay.

22 Aug 2019

The present review petition was filed by Electronics & Controls Power Systems Private Limited under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code ...

High Court

High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Municipal Contract Dispute — Arbitration Agreement Inferred from Exchange of Letters. The court held that letters dated 19-01-2018 and 12-03-2018 constituted a valid arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed a sole arbitrator.

18 Feb 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Shyamraju & Company (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed two civil miscellaneous petitions under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Concili...

High Court

High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Municipal Contract Dispute Under Section 11(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Existence of Arbitration Agreement Established Through Exchange of Letters. The court held that letters dated 19-01-2018 and 12-03-2018 constituted a valid arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Act.

18 Feb 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Shyamraju & Company (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed two civil miscellaneous petitions under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Concili...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Construction Firm and HAL Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Both parties consented to appointment of arbitrator from panel of Arbitration Centre - Karnataka.

20 Sep 2018

The petitioner, M/s V.K.A. Constructions Engineers & Contractors, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator Due to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in Work Order vesting jurisdiction in Delhi courts ousts jurisdiction of Karnataka High Court under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Polybond Organics Private Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute Between L&T and HPCL — Court Sets Aside Award on Claims for Extra Work and Interest, Upholds Claims for Refund of Liquidated Damages and Escalation. The court restored the arbitrator's award on refund of liquidated damages and escalation, holding that the Single Judge exceeded the limited scope of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Sep 2016

The case involves two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Arbitrator in Commercial Lease Dispute — Failure to Nominate Arbitrator Despite Arbitration Clause. Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where a party fails to appoint an arbitrator, the court may appoint one.

24 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Satyam Cineplexes Limited, a company engaged in managing multiplex cinema halls, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on 1...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)