Search Results for "IPC 366A"

51 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 51 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Abduction Case Under Section 366-A IPC Due to Lack of Proof of Minority and Absence of Allegation of Illicit Intercourse. Inconsistent Testimony of Victim and Failure to Establish Ingredients of Offence Lead to Acquittal.

The appeal arose from the order of the Revisional Court confirming the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 366-A of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Transfer of Juvenile Case to Children's Court for Trial as Adult — Petitioner Failed to Show Error in Board's Assessment of Mental and Physical Capacity to Commit Heinous Offence.

The petitioner, H.S. Poornesh, was a child in conflict with law (CICWL) charged with offences under Sections 341, 376, 506, and 417 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 101 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 — Sets Aside Order Declining to Treat Accused as Juvenile. Court Holds That Age Determination Must Be Based on Earliest Available Evidence and Benefit of Doubt Must Be Given to Accused.

The appellant, Sri Puneet S, was the sole accused in a case charge-sheeted for offences under Sections 366A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Unproven Age and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 376, 363, 366 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Minority and Credible Evidence.

The case involves an appeal by Subhash Bharsakle and his mother Leelabai against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot, in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Land Dispute Case. Circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen, extra-judicial confession, and recovery of incriminating articles held sufficient to convict under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Dnyaneshwar Tauba Gonde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 188/2013 for the murder of a v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Hostile Witness. Conviction Under Sections 365, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shaikh Mahemood Sk. Osman, was convicted by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No.35 of 1997 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony of Prosecutrix. Voluntary Accompaniment by Minor Girl Fails to Establish Enticement Under Section 363 IPC.

The appellant, Hemraj s/o Sampatrao Bhoyar, was convicted by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 163/1997 for the offence ...