Search Results for "Grampanchayat member"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Grampanchayat member"

216 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Woman Panchayat Member in Encroachment Case — Lack of Evidence of Residence on Government Land. Collector's order set aside as spot inspection report failed to establish that petitioner resided on encroached government land, and no notice was given before inspection.

20 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Swati Sachin Balge, was a member of the Village Panchayat, Tajnapur. Respondent No.1, Appasaheb Kisan Veer, applied under Sections 14(...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Orders Setting Aside No-Confidence Motions Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch of Grampanchayat. The Core Issue Involved Validity of Service of Notice and Procedural Compliance Under Bombay Village Panchayat Sarpanch and UpSarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975.

8 Feb 2013

The writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged concurrent orders of the Additional Collector, Parbhani and the Divisiona...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch — Procedural Irregularities Not Sufficient to Invalidate Motion Passed by Majority. The court held that the no-confidence motion passed by a majority of 9 out of 13 members was valid under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and the alleged procedural irregularities did not vitiate the motion.

22 Nov 2016

The petitioners, 13 ex-members of the Grampanchayat of Rukadi, filed a writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

6 Apr 2010

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch in Bombay Village Panchayat Act Case Due to Husband's Encroachment on Government Land. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

14 Jun 2011

The petitioner, Sau. Savitabai Sanjay Meshram, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Ashtgaon in 2007 on a seat reserved for Scheduled Caste woman....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member for Having Four Children — Birth Date Correction of Fourth Child Accepted, Disqualification Set Aside. The court held that the Additional Collector failed to consider the correction of the birth date of the fourth child, which would bring the child's birth before the cut-off date under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

4 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Padmakar Pandurang Kale, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Maradga, on 24/10/2010. Respondent No.1, Santosh Kale, challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Disqualify Panchayat Member for Having More Than Two Children Under Section 14(b) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. The Court held that the disqualification provision applies to any person having more than two children, regardless of whether the children are from the same spouse or different relationships, and that the Collector's order rejecting the disqualification application was perverse and unsustainable.

23 Mar 2022

The Petitioner, Shri Tanaji Jagannath Palave, an elected Member of Panchayat Samiti from Ward No.5 of Village Panchayat Mandave, filed a writ petition...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No Confidence Motion Despite Prior Resignation. Resignation Not Effective Until Approval by Panchayat Samiti, No Confidence Motion Validly Passed Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

27 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Chandrakant Bapuso Rugge, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat, Tamdalge. He tendered his resignation on 17 August 2012, addressed to the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch for Encroachment on Government Land under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. The Additional Divisional Commissioner correctly set aside the Collector's order as the inspection report provided sufficient material to prove encroachment under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

9 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Sunita Pandalwad, was elected as a member of Grampanchayat Bori (Kh.) in March 2021 and later became Sarpanch. Respondent No. 5 filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Collector's Refusal to Disqualify Sarpanch for Encroachment — No Encroachment on Public Land Found; Toilet Constructed on Private Land Does Not Attract Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act.

28 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Sanjay Kantilal Thakare, an elected member of Grampanchayat Akkalkuwa, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangaba...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)