Search Results for "Goa Town and Country Planning"

57 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Are Only for Fiscal Purposes Under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, Shree Sai Reality, Shree Sai Infratech, and Shree Sai Buildtech, through their partner Sandeep Dindyal Aagarval, filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Lease Dispute Over Temporary Injunction — Prima Facie Case and Irreparable Injury Established. Lease Deed from 1974 Not Terminated, Appellant's Possession and Business Operations Protected.

The appellant, Shri Rajaram M. Caisukar, filed an appeal against an order dated 24/11/2015 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Panaji, dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhancement from ₹59.58 to ₹1235 per sq. mt. Upheld. Market value determined based on exemplar sale deeds and location of acquired land in Mapusa City.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the State (Land Acquisition Officer and Executive Engineer) against the judgment and award dated 9/02/2011 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.

The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission for Construction Allegedly Encroaching on Public Right of Way. Court finds no violation of licence conditions and holds that petitioners failed to establish any public right of way over the property.

The petitioners, a village group and its president, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging development permiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cellular Company's Petition Against Panchayat Orders for Demolition of Telecom Tower. Held that a mobile phone tower is not a 'building' under Section 135 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, and the Panchayat lacked jurisdiction to require prior permission or order removal.

The petitioner, Bharti Cellular Ltd., a cellular service provider, installed a mobile phone tower on the terrace of a building in Navelim, Goa. The Vi...