Search Results for "Film City"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Film City"

150 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Anti-Suit Injunction Application in International Arbitration Enforcement Dispute. Court holds that Indian courts cannot restrain enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in New York when the award debtor has submitted to the jurisdiction of the foreign court.

2 Feb 2015

The case involves a dispute between E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Ltd. (E-City), an Indian company part of the Essel Group, and Imax Corporation (IMAX...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Agreement Dispute. Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from termination of agreement over alleged plagiarism and failure to deliver a film.

11 Jul 2018

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Reliance Media Works Limited (formerly Adlabs Films Ltd.) ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Family Property Dispute — Allegations of Criminal Breach of Trust and Cheating Found to Be Civil in Nature. Dispute over partnership firm and film rights held not to constitute criminal offences under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC as no criminal intent established.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a family dispute among the Mehra family over a partnership firm and film rights. The petitioners (Umesh Mehra, Rajesh Mehra, Rajiv M...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears State of Maharashtra's Appeals Against High Court's Decision Striking Down Section 33A of Bombay Police Act, 1951 as Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The core issue is whether the prohibition of dance performances in eating houses, permit rooms, or beer bars is a reasonable restriction on trade and is within the State's legislative competence.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and others assailing the judgment and order dated 12th April 2006 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Appeal in Township Development Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction Against Developer. Court holds that trial court erred in granting injunction in favor of landowners without considering development agreement and power of attorney, and that balance of convenience favored the developer.

25 Oct 2023

The appeal arises from an order dated 3 October 2022 passed by the 11th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, rejecting the appellant-plaintiff's a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in MPID Act Case — Intercorporate Deposits Not Covered Under MPID Act. Loan advanced by one company to another company registered under Companies Act, 1956 does not constitute a 'deposit' under Section 2(c) of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Ashish Mahendrakar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Copyright Dispute Over Film Pakeezah Songs — Assignment of Musical Rights Held Valid and Exclusive. The petitioner, as assignee of sole and exclusive musical recording rights under an agreement dated 13th February 1971, was entitled to exploit the rights without interference from the original plaintiff.

22 Sep 2011

The petitioner, Saregama India Limited (formerly Gramophone Company of India Limited), filed a civil revision application challenging an order passed ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Karwar Port Expansion Over SEIAA Authority and Consent Deficiencies. Petitions by Fishermen Associations Raise Category A Project and Pollution Control Compliance Issues Under EIA Notification.

29 Jul 2021

Two public interest litigations were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Copyright Infringement Suit — Suit Barred by Limitation Under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963. Cause of Action First Arose in 1995 When Plaintiffs Had Knowledge of Defendants' Claims, Not in 2003 When Notice Was Issued.

6 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the defendant (M/s. Zee Telefilms Ltd., now Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd.) against the judgment of ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Defendants in Copyright Infringement Suit, Quashes Ex Parte Injunction for Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC. Trial Court Failed to Record Reasons or Issue Notice Before Granting Ex Parte Injunction, Violating Mandatory Provisions of CPC.

11 Jan 2017

The petitioners, Paramvah Studios Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director Rakshit Shetty, were defendants in a suit filed by Lahari Recording Company (res...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)