Search Results for "Extension of time"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Extension of time"

87 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Appeal in Teacher Eligibility Case — Extends Time for In-Service Teachers to Acquire TET Qualification. Appellant appointed as Tamil Pandit in 2012 without TET was terminated; Court following Supreme Court's extension in Review Petition extends time to acquire TET by 31st August 2028.

3 Jun 2026

The appellant, H. Suriyakala, was appointed as Tamil Pandit in a Government Aided Higher Secondary School in 2012. The essential qualification of pass...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Conditional Leave to Defend in Commercial Suit, Extends Time for Deposit Due to Illness of Defendant's Father. The Court held that illness of a family member constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time under Order XXXVII CPC, and set aside the Commercial Court's rejection of extension application.

24 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Bhatia International (India) through its partner Gagnish Bhatia, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 227 of the Constituti...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Extend Time for Depositing Costs in Rent Control Appeal — Condonation of Delay Conditional on Cost Deposit, Failure to Deposit Within Extended Time Results in Dismissal of Appeal

13 Mar 2026

The applicant, Dakshkumar Hasmukhbhai Desai, filed a civil revision application under Section 29(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotels and Lodging House Rate...

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Port Contract Dispute — Liquidated Damages Recovery Upheld for 768-Day Delay. The court held that extension of time does not bar recovery of liquidated damages under Section 55 of Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the contractor must prove no loss was caused.

9 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Chennai Port Trust, issued a tender for restoration of a damaged revetment structure after cyclones. The respondent, a contractor, was...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in MTNL v. B. Bhamra Construction Co. — Escalation Claims Barred by Contractual Clause Despite Extension of Time. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award escalation costs contrary to an express contractual bar, even if the contract period is extended by consent.

7 Feb 2012

The Petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd (MTNL), challenged an arbitral award dated 31st October 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 3...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Extension of Time to File Written Statement in Motor Accident Claim Petition — Order 8 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable. The court held that Rule 300 of the Goa Motor Vehicles Rules, 1991 does not include Order 8 Rule 1 CPC, and the Tribunal has discretion to extend time for filing written statement under Rule 292.

12 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Mr. Braz Dias, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Margao, which rejected his applicatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Trial Court Order Permitting Late Filing of Written Statement Without Considering Sufficient Cause — Order VIII Rule 1 CPC. Trial Court Must Consider Grounds for Delay Before Setting Aside 'No Written Statement Order'.

17 Dec 2011

The petitioner, original plaintiff, filed Regular Civil Suit No.502 of 2008 for permanent injunction against the respondents. The defendants appeared ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Permitting Filing of Written Statement After Two Years. Court holds that Order VIII Rule 1 CPC is directory but must be complied with within 90 days, and extension beyond 90 days requires recording of reasons.

28 Nov 2011

The petitioner filed a suit against the respondent (sole defendant). Summons were issued, but the defendant failed to file a written statement within ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Filing of Written Statement Beyond Time in Civil Suit — Emphasizes Procedure as Handmaiden of Justice. Order 8 Rule 1 CPC time limit can be extended for just reasons; hyper-technical approach deprecated.

5 Aug 2011

The petitioner, M/s All India Engineering Company Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor in Railway Contract Dispute — Rejects Challenge Based on Excepted Matters and Delay in Raising Counterclaim. The court found no ground to interfere under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the Arbitral Tribunal had considered the contractual provisions and extensions granted by consent.

14 Jan 2011

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Petitioner) against an Arbitral Award dated 16 December 2005 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in a...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)