Search Results for "EXIM policy"

73 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Customs Department's Reference Application in Export Valuation Case. Tribunal's finding that facts were indistinguishable from precedent upheld, no question of law arises.

The Principal Commissioner of Customs filed a Civil Petition under Section 130A of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the final order of the Central E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act for Alleged Smuggling of Red Sanders. Questions Raised Over Violation of Right to Equal Representation and Proper Subjective Satisfaction.

The petition was filed by the wife of the detenu Ajit Bapu Satam, challenging his preventive detention under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Arbitration Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Award Was Not in Conflict with Public Policy and Did Not Suffer from Patent Illegality.

The petitioner, Hi Style India Pvt. Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an Arbitral A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Counter Guarantee Dispute. Claim Barred by Limitation and Failure to Prove Invocation of Guarantee.

The petitioner, Punjab and Maharashtra Co-op. Bank Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Supplied.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Kirti Vanabhai Patel, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the detentio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions Against GOL Offshore Ltd. Due to Bona Fide Dispute and Absence of Commercial Insolvency. Debt Not Due and Payable Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns two winding up petitions filed by Export-Import Bank of India and Punjab National Bank (International) Ltd. against GOL Offshore...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Validity of Customs Circular Mandating BIS Certification for Alloy Steel Deformed Bars. The Circular is Challenged as Ultra Vires the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 and Violative of Fundamental Rights.

The four writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed by importers of alloy steel deformed bars/reinforcement bars challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SEBI's Appeal Against Interim Order Restraining Adjudication Proceedings. Civil Suit Against SEBI Held Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Under SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) against an interim order passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...