Search Results for "Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996"

1657 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1657 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by State Undertaking in BOT Arbitration Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award on Termination Payment. Court Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Emphasizing Finality of Arbitral Awards.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MPRDC) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 and 11 Petitions in License Termination Dispute with Airports Authority of India. Disputes Over Termination of License to Occupy Airport Premises Held Arbitrable Despite Public Premises Act.

The Bombay High Court dealt with three connected proceedings: two petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and one app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitrator Appointment in Tender Dispute Due to Absence of Concluded Contract. No Valid Arbitration Agreement Found as Letter of Intent Was Contingent on Formal Work Order Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), a state government electricity distribution utility, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Refers Dispute to Arbitration. Holds That Arbitration Agreement Is Valid and Not Null and Void, Inoperative, or Incapable of Being Performed.

The petitioner, Bottero S.p.A., filed an arbitration petition under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to refer the dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits.

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Revocation of Leave Under Clause XII of Letters Patent Act in Arbitration Petition. Court Holds That Cause of Action for Section 9 Petition Arises Where Arbitration Agreement Is Situated, Not Where Interim Relief Is Sought.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who allowed Chamber Summons No. 905 of 2013 filed by Respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. Court sets aside award for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider counterclaims.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising out of the same arbitral award. The petitioners (original respondents) challenged the award un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award — Part I of Arbitration Act Inapplicable. Section 34 petition under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 held not maintainable for foreign award with seat in London.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellant's arbitration petition under section 34 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favor of Singapore Seller Against Indian Buyer. Rejects Objections Based on Conflicting Jurisdiction Clauses and Public Policy Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd., a Singapore-based company, filed a petition under Sections 47 and 48 of the Arbitration ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Anti-Arbitration Injunction in Facilitation Deed Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Has Competence to Decide Validity of Underlying Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from a commercial dispute between MSM Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd. (Sony) and World Sport Group (Mauritius) Limited (WSG) concerni...