Search Results for "hierarchy"

664 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 664 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 — Held That Seizure Without Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 105 of the Act Requires Show-Cause Notice Before Confiscation.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by owners of vehicles that were seized by the State Excise Department under Section 105 of the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Bank's Illegal Dispossession of Auction Purchaser. Petitioner Purchased Flat in 2017 Auction by SBI, but Was Forcibly Evicted by Saraswat Bank in 2025 Without Due Process.

The petitioners, Mariyam Rangwala and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging DMA's Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 44 of Goa Municipalities Act, 1968 — Director of Municipal Administration Not Vested with Power to Remove Councillor for Misconduct.

The petitioner, Mr. Jervis Fernandes, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging an order dated 29.09.2023 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Railway's Petition Challenging CAT Order on Pay Refixation. Repatriated Employee Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Enjoyed in Ex-Cadre Post, Refixation Set Aside.

The Union of India and railway authorities (petitioners) challenged an order dated 28.11.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Review Petition in SC/ST Land Grant Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition against order in Writ Petition No.7988/2002 dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record or grounds for review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The case arises from a review petition filed against the order dated 17.06.2013 in Writ Petition No.7988/2002. The original writ petition involved a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in VAT Case Due to Limitation Bar — Reassessment Order Passed Beyond 5-Year Limitation Under Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003 Cannot Be Sustained Despite Court Direction. Court Directions Cannot Extend Statutory Limitation Period.

The petitioner, M/s. Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Arbitrator in Section 11 Petition After Nine-Year Delay. Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed in 2008, finally disposed with appointment of sole arbitrator.

The petitioner, N.K. Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on 12.08.2008, seeking ...