Search Results for "Decree satisfaction"

1264 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1264 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Under Section 14 of Admiralty Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Defendant's Notice of Motion. The dispute concerned breach of a bareboat charterparty and a subsequent time charterparty regarding a vessel.

The original plaintiff, Siem Offshore Rederi AS, a Norwegian company, filed Admiralty Suit (L) No. 20 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Additional Evidence in Appeal Against Order Refusing Revocation of Administrator. Order XLI Rule 27 CPC requires strict proof of due diligence for admitting additional evidence at appellate stage.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by Ferani Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant) under Order XLI, Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Executing Court Order for Non-Application of Mind in Decree Satisfaction Dispute. Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration of Adjustment Principles Under Civil Procedure Code.

The petitioner, M/s Shyam Builders, the original decree holder, challenged the order dated 15.12.2001 passed by the Executing Court in Special Darkhas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Trial Court Decree for Declaration, Injunction and Possession. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a property dispute where the appellant, Smt. Sarala Kalaghatagi, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Common Property. Suit for partition and separate possession fails as plaintiff failed to prove that suit schedule properties were joint family properties.

The appellant, Domegunta Venkatasesha Reddy, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Partition and Declaration. Daughter Challenges Will Dated 15.06.2001 Alleging Suspicious Circumstances and Non-Compliance with Proof Requirements Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1956.

The Regular First Appeal arose from a suit for declaration, partition, and mesne profits filed by one of the daughters of late M. Krishnappa. The dece...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Suit for Compensation and Declaration of Sale Agreement as Void. Amendment Sought to Challenge Agreement for Sale of Property Allegedly Purchased with Siphoned Funds Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

The Plaintiff, Edit II Productions, filed a suit seeking compensation for financial loss caused by the Defendants who allegedly siphoned funds from th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enforcement of Consent Terms Against Non-Signatory Defendant in Debenture Dispute. Interpretation of Consent Decree Held That Clause 11(a) Obligation to Pay Was Only on Defendant No.5, Not Defendant No.6, Who Was Not a Party to the Consent Terms.

The case involves two appeals filed by the original Defendant No.5 (Dewanchand Ramsaran Trading Pvt. Ltd. and others) against a common order of the le...