Search Results for "Compulsory Acquisition"

538 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 538 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Lease Dispute Over Requirement of Notice Under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act. Tenant at Sufferance Does Not Require Notice for Eviction Under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The dispute concerns a plot of land in Siliguri, West Bengal, leased by the appellant to the respondent for 15 years under an unregistered indenture d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Declares Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 Ultra Vires for Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appellate Jurisdiction on Supreme Court; Provision Invalid.

The case arose from an appeal filed under Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, against an eviction order passed by the Rent Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Reassessment Notice Under Section 148-A of Income Tax Act for Denial of Personal Hearing. Assessee's Show Cause Notice and Order Set Aside as Principles of Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioner, Popatlal Umedmalji Jain, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, regularly filed income tax returns. His wife ran a proprietary co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reason to Believe. Transfer of Development Rights Not Constituting Transfer Under Section 2(47) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Late Bharat Jayantilal Patel (since deceased through legal heir Smt. Minal Bharat Patel), challenged a notice issued under Section 148...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reservation Condition in Development Permission Dispute. MHADA Housing Reservation Deleted by Sanctioned Modification to Development Plan, Municipal Corporation Cannot Insist on Compliance.

The petitioner, Cosmos Constructions, a partnership firm, owned land at Chitalsar, Manpada, Thane. The Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) imposed Condi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Petitioners in Corruption Case Involving Alleged Forgery of Will and Misappropriation of Property. Court Holds That Custodial Interrogation Not Required When Documents Are Already Seized and Petitioners Are Willing to Cooperate.

The petitioners, Eknath Ganpatrao Khadse (aged 72), Mandakini Eknath Khadse (aged 62), and Girish Dayaram Chaudhary (aged 50), filed a Criminal Writ P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Ulhasnagar Development Plan, Upholds Statutory Process. Court holds that objections to draft development plan must be raised before the planning authority under MRTP Act, and belated challenges after final notification are not maintainable.

The judgment concerns two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the development plan for Ulhasnagar city. ...