Search Results for "notice under section 19(2)"

681 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 681 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Father's Appeal in Child Custody Dispute, Upholds Use of Mediator and Counsellor Reports. Reports of Child Counsellor and Mediator Regarding Child's Behavior and Attitude Are Not Confidential Under Mediation Confidentiality Rules.

The appellant, Perry Kansagra, a Kenyan and British citizen, and the respondent, Smriti Madan Kansagra, an Indian citizen, married on 29 July 2007 in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appeal and Dismisses Foreclosure Suit Due to Improper Joinder and Limitation Bar. Court Reverses High Court's Addition of Plaintiffs and Defendants Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC as the Added Parties' Claims Were Time-Barred Under Section 22 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908.

The dispute arose from a mortgage executed in 1934 in the former State of Hyderabad. The mortgage amount became due in 1943. The first respondent, cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction Under UAPA and IPC for Terrorist Conspiracy and Murder. Conspiracy to Kill Rationalist Activist Proved Through Circumstantial Evidence and Confession of Co-Accused.

The appellant, Mirza Himayat Beig @ Umar, was convicted by the trial court for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Patwari in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay Ramdas Kalmegh, was a Patwari at Pimpri-Deshmukh, Maharashtra. The complainant, Raghunath Tandale, owned agricultural land and a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Cross-Objection and Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, No Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.1,80,000/- to Rs.3,34,000/- with 6% Interest.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of a deceased 20-year-old man who died in a road accident on 23-07-2007. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenges to Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award on termination and damages but modifies interest rate and clarifies that the builder is entitled to retain constructed area as per agreement.

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Delivers Common Judgment in Batch of Writ Appeals Involving Employment Claims of BHEL Apprentices. Appeals Challenge Dismissal of Writ Petitions on Grounds of Change in Recruitment Policy and Applicability of Apprentices Act, 1961.

This common judgment concerned a batch of writ appeals filed by individuals who completed apprentice training at Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHE...