WRIT PETITION NOS. 4564, 4565
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "commercial execution"
2004 result(s) found
Found 2004 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Challenge to Execution of Arbitral Award on Ground of Non-Receipt of Signed Copy Under Section 31(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Receipt of Certified Copy by Post Satisfies Section 31(5) and Award Becomes Enforceable Under Section 36(1).
10 Apr 2023The petitioner, Rahul S/o Omprakash Gandhi, filed four writ petitions (W.P. Nos. 6091/2022, 6092/2022, 6093/2022, and 6094/2022) challenging the execu...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Society's Refusal to Grant Membership to Purchaser of Premises. Registered Sale Deed Holder Entitled to Membership Under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Despite Developer's Objection.
16 Apr 2019The petitioners, Apna Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its Deputy General Manager, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Execution Proceedings for Recovery of Loan Amount — Interest Rate Discrepancy Between Decree and Contract Renders Execution Invalid. The execution application claimed interest at 21% per annum while the decree specified 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization, violating Section 34 CPC and Order 21 Rule 11 CPC.
18 Jun 2019The petitioner, Rajesh Kishan Khanaj, was the original judgment debtor in a suit filed by the Federal Bank Limited for recovery of a term loan of Rs.1...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Order of Asset Disclosure and Injunction in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds disclosure direction but modifies injunction to apply only to assets sufficient to secure the claim amount.
10 Mar 2022The case involves a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Manish Khera and another (petitioners) challengi...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus to Compel Tender Award for High Security Registration Plates. Court holds that the petitioners failed to demonstrate any legal right to compel the respondents to award the tender after the tender process was cancelled due to policy changes and pending litigation.
16 Jul 2015The petitioners, Utsav Safety Systems Pvt. Ltd. and Rosemerta Autotech Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking a ...
- 161
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Against Service Tax on Seed Supply and Allows Writ Against Sales Tax on Franchise Agreement. Technology-Embedded Seed Supply Held to Be a Sale Under MVAT Act, While Franchise Licensing Held to Be a Service Under Finance Act.
11 Aug 2016The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard together two writ petitions concerning the tax characterisation of commercial transactions under the serv...
- 29
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Revision in KVAT Case — Tribunal's Factual Finding on Stock Transfer Not Interfered With. Section 65 of KVAT Act, 2003 does not permit re-appreciation of evidence unless perversity is shown.
7 Aug 2014The State of Karnataka, represented by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, filed a revision petition under Section 65 of the Karnataka Value Added T...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order Against ACB Officers for Lack of Sanction. The Court Holds That Cognizance of Offences Alleged to Have Been Committed in Discharge of Official Duties Requires Prior Sanction Under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
5 Jul 2024The matter arose from a private complaint filed by the respondent against seven officers of the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB), Bengaluru, alleging offe...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Contract Dispute. Court holds that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favor grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.
6 Jun 2022The Appellant, Chitali Bottling Limited, filed a Special Civil Suit No.95 of 2020 before the 19th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, seeking a ...
- 36
