Search Results for "Rule 222"

673 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 673 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act — Purpose of Instrument Failed. Development Agreement is an instrument covered under Section 47(c)(5) for refund when the purpose fails, and Section 48 is only a limitation provision.

The petitioner, M/s. Chandiwala Enterprises, a registered partnership firm, entered into a Development Agreement with Neel Ashiward CHS Ltd. on 2nd Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Departmental Promotion Committee Recommendations in Postal Department Recruitment. Court Holds That Candidates Who Were Not Considered for Promotion Due to Non-Inclusion of Their Names in the Zone of Consideration Must Be Considered Afresh.

The petitioners, a group of 86 individuals employed in various capacities such as Postal Assistant, Sorting Assistant, Postman, and Mail Guard in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Gift Deed in Ancestral Property Dispute — Property Devised by Will Held Self-Acquired. Gift Deed Valid as Execution Not Specifically Denied, No Attesting Witness Required Under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The present appeal arises from a second appeal before the Gujarat High Court concerning a gift deed executed by Chhotabhai Ashabhai Patel (donor) on N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Court holds that mere allegations without corroboration cannot justify denial of bail under Section 14-A(2) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by accused persons (Amol Sonawne, Sanket Somwanshi, and Arun Saha) against the rejection of thei...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Bring Legal Representatives on Record in Heirship Certificate Dispute. Right to Sue Does Not Survive After Death of Appellant Claiming Heirship Certificate Under Bombay Regulation Act 8 of 1827.

The case arose from a dispute between two women, Anita Anant Patil and Malini Anant Patil, each claiming to be the legally wedded wife of the deceased...