Search Results for "Rule 147 proviso"

623 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 623 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Commercial Appeal, Upholds Arbitral Award in ICT Project Dispute — Termination Found Unlawful. Composite Contract and Direct Nexus Between State and Consortium Rendered Claim Maintainable, and Arbitral Award of Rs.178.98 Crores Not Against Public Policy.

The appeal arises from an arbitral award of Rs.178,98,38,525 in favour of respondent No.1, a consortium partner, against the State of Karnataka for wr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by AO. Section 148 Notice for AY 2014-15 Set Aside as Reasons Recorded Were Mechanical and Lacked Independent Satisfaction.

The petitioner, Sanvira Holdings, a partnership firm part of the PSY Group engaged in real estate business, filed its return of income for Assessment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Search Action Under Section 132 Cannot Be Basis for Reopening Beyond Four Years Without New Tangible Evidence.

The petitioner, Mahesh Dharamshi Prajapati, an individual and major partner of PSY Group engaged in real estate business, filed his return of income f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for AY 2014-15 Due to Limitation Under Section 149(1)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Notice issued beyond six-year period from end of assessment year held invalid as escaped income did not involve assets of value exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs.

The petitioner, a major partner of PSY Group engaged in real estate business, challenged a notice dated 27.03.2025 issued under Section 148 of the Inc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record, not re-agitating merits.

The case pertains to a review petition filed by M/s National Textile Corporation Ltd. and another (the original respondents) seeking review of a judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in NI Act Case, Restores Conviction Despite Change of Magistrate. Section 143 of Negotiable Instruments Act Overrides Section 326(3) CrPC, Succeeding Magistrate Can Proceed on Evidence Recorded by Predecessor.

The petitioner, Shivaji Sampat Jagtap, filed a Criminal Revision Application against the judgment of the Sessions Court which had set aside his convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009

The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...