Search Results for "Resolution plan approval"

765 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 765 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Order in IBC Case for Lack of Reasons — Appellant Failed to Show Prejudice from Impugned Order. The appeal under Section 61 of IBC was dismissed as the appellant did not demonstrate any prejudice caused by the non-speaking order.

The appellant, Dr. Yartagadda Krishna Mohan, filed a Company Appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 before the National C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Apex Grievance Redressal Committee Order in Slum Rehabilitation Case. AGRC's Reversal of Developer Termination Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Hanuman Nagar (Jogeshwari) SRA CHS (Proposed), is a society of slum dwellers residing on a plot in Jogeshwari, Mumbai. In 2006, the ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Assignment of Debt by Government Authority in CIRP. Assignment of operational debt by a government authority to a private entity is valid under the IBC, and the assignee becomes an operational creditor with voting rights in the CoC.

The appeal was filed by Ellison Oil Field Services Pvt. Ltd. against an order of the NCLT, Mumbai Bench 1 dated 21.08.2024, which dismissed an applica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Writ Petitions Against Slum Rehabilitation Permissions — Earlier Appeals Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Dismissed. Developer Contends Petitioners Lack Locus Standi as Only Minority of Society Members Objected.

The case involved two writ petitions filed by certain members of registered co-operative housing societies, namely Hanuman Hitwardhak SRA CHS Ltd., Ek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conversion of Open Space to Commercial Plot by MIDC — Violation of Public Trust and Statutory Procedure. Allotment of Reserved Open Space Without Following Section 14 of MIDC Act and Without Public Auction is Illegal.

The petitioners, residents of Waluj Industrial Area, Aurangabad, and one of them being an industrial unit holder, challenged the action of the Maharas...