WRIT PETITION NO. 2393 OF 2017
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "writ petition common order"
6589 result(s) found
Found 6589 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Whether Bunker Fuel Sales to Vessels on High Seas Are Taxable Under Maharashtra VAT Act. Petitioners Challenged Assessment Orders and Recovery Notices Claiming Sales Occurred Outside State Territory and Were in Course of Export.
19 Oct 2015The dispute arose from assessment and recovery proceedings under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 concerning sales of High Speed Diesel (HSD)...
- 38
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Deputy Commissioner's Order Restoring Assistant Commissioner's PTCL Decision — Land Transfer Restrictions Under the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 Examined. The core issue revolves around the applicability of the PTCL Act to lands granted under 1942 government orders offering lease and purchase options to cultivators.
24 Jan 2025The writ petitions sought to quash the common order of the Deputy Commissioner dated 22.05.2023, which set aside the Assistant Commissioner's order da...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment in Letters Patent Appeals Against Dismissal of Writ Petitions in Land Lease Resumption Case — Outcome Not Stated in Provided Excerpt
29 Oct 2013The dispute pertained to a plot of land in Bandra, Mumbai, originally leased by the Secretary of State for India in 1906 to Mrs. E.J. Menesse and othe...
- 18
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Delivers Judgment in Writ Petition Filed by Probationer Judicial Officer Challenging Discharge Order. The Court Examines Whether Allegations Constituted 'Motive' or 'Foundation' for Termination.
3 May 2018The Writ Petition filed by a probationer Judicial Officer challenges his discharge from service. The Petitioner was appointed as Civil Judge Junior Di...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order Allowing Settlement Application. Settlement Commission's Finding of Full and True Disclosure of Income by Assessee in Case of Alleged Bogus Purchases Upheld Under Section 245D of Income Tax Act, 1961.
8 May 2015The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders passed by the Inco...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Engineering College to Participate in CAP Admissions Despite AICTE’s Reduction of Intake Capacity. The Court Held That the College’s Non-Listing on AICTE Website Should Not Affect Admission Process, Subject to Final Outcome.
3 Aug 2015The Petitioner, Saraswati Education Society’s Saraswati College of Engineering, an institution established in 1997 and offering undergraduate engine...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Workers' Appeal in Contract Labour Dispute — IPCA Laboratories Held Liable as Principal Employer Under Contract Labour Act. The court held that the Labour Enforcement Officer's complaint under Section 22A of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 was maintainable and that the company was the principal employer, rejecting the company's challenge to the cognizance order.
23 Nov 2022The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from a common order in Writ Petition No. 2791 of 2009. The appellants in LPA No. 270 of 2009 are ...
- 67
High Court
Gujarat High Court Quashes Dismissal of Police Constable Convicted Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Emphasizes Need for Independent Disciplinary Inquiry. Court holds that dismissal based solely on conviction without considering mitigating factors and without affording opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice and Article 311(2) of the Constitution.
20 Mar 2026The petitioner, Piyushbhai Bhagvatbhai Gamit, was appointed as a Police Constable on 30.04.2001. An FIR was registered against him on 12.08.2010 under...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Contempt of Courts Act Provisions as Unconstitutional — Petitioner's Allegations of Violation of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights Rejected. Court holds that Sections 2(c), 12, 14 and 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 are not unconstitutional and that the contempt proceedings against the petitioner are not liable to be quashed.
4 May 2017The petitioner, Satish Mahadeorao Uke, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a dec...
- 55
