KAHC010211662021_1
31 Mar 2023Background: The case involves multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...
Search Results for "urban land tax"
506 result(s) found
Found 506 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Interim Stay of Excise Rule Amendments. State Challenges Ad Interim Order Staying Amended Rules 5 and 5-A of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968, Introduced by Second Amendment Rules, 2025.
15 Apr 2026The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 against an ad interim order dated 25.11.2025 passed b...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Revision Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Interlocutory Procedural Orders Not Revisable. Division Bench Holds That Revision Under Section 34(4) is Limited to Orders Affecting Rights or Liabilities of Parties and Does Not Extend to Purely Procedural Orders Passed Under CPC.
21 Jan 2013The Bombay High Court was seized of three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging orders passed by the Court of Small Causes ...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenants for Unauthorized Permanent Structure Under Bombay Rent Act. Tenants' Construction of Wooden Rafters and Tin Sheet Roof Without Landlord's Written Consent Constitutes Permanent Structure Under Section 13(1)(b) of Bombay Rents, Hotel Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.
8 Aug 2005The dispute involved tenants who had replaced the original flat roof of the rented premises with 12 wooden rafters and 18 tin sheet roofs without obta...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Amendment of Section 88 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Insertion of Third and Fourth Provisos Permitting Government Extension of Time for Inquiry Against Delinquent Promoters is Constitutionally Valid and Not Retrospective Penal Legislation.
2 May 2019The dispute arose from an inquiry under Section 88(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 initiated against former directors of the Ma...
- 22
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Regularisation of Irregular Allotment of Land for Commercial Complex in Navi Mumbai, Imposing Restitution of Rs. 100 Crore. The Court held that where irreversible economic and social consequences have crystallised over two decades, public interest may be better served by regularisation with full financial restitution rather than demolition.
1 Jan 2026The case pertains to a challenge against the allotment of land by CIDCO to K. Raheja Corp. Private Limited (the Developer) for the construction of a s...
- 152
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Order in Deemed License Case — Failure to Decide Application Within Time Results in Deemed Grant Under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The Court held that the Corporation's inaction for over a year led to automatic grant of building license, and the demolition order without notice was illegal.
20 Dec 2021The petitioner, a resident of Shimogga, owned a site and applied for a building license on 13.11.2020. The Corporation failed to decide the applicatio...
- 157
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.
21 Dec 2016The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...
- 22
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Demurrage Claim. Interpretation of Clause 10(v) of Coal Supply Contract as Creating Primary Liability, Not Indemnity, and Binding Effect of Laytime Statement When No Disagreement Raised Within 30 Days Upheld.
21 Dec 2016The dispute arose out of a contract dated 18 September 1999 between Ultratech Cement Ltd. (appellant, formerly Larsen & Toubro Ltd.) and Sunfield Reso...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Objection to Attachment Under MPID Act — Property Belonging to Appellants Not Proceeds of Crime. The court held that the appellants, as bona fide purchasers, are entitled to release of attachment under Section 7(3) of the MPID Act as the property was purchased prior to the alleged deposit scheme.
6 Mar 2020The case involves an appeal under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 (MPID Act...
- 51
