Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Interim Stay of Excise Rule Amendments. State Challenges Ad Interim Order Staying Amended Rules 5 and 5-A of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968, Introduced by Second Amendment Rules, 2025.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 against an ad interim order dated 25.11.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge in WP.No.35227/2025 (Excise). The writ petitioners (respondents) were CL‑9 licence holders under the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968. They challenged the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) (Second Amendment) Rules, 2025, which amended Rules 5, 5‑A and 12 of the 1968 Rules, alleging these amendments were illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and ultra vires the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965. The amendments introduced e‑auction for certain licences, new definitions, and altered the grant and renewal of CL‑9 licences. The Single Judge stayed the operation, implementation and enforcement of amended Rules 5 and 5‑A pending further hearing. The State, represented by the Advocate General, contended that the stay was unwarranted. The appeal was heard and reserved on an unspecified date, and judgment was pronounced on 15.04.2026. The available text sets out the impugned amendments but does not include the court’s analysis or final decision.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Excise Regulations - Interim Stay - Rule 5, 5-A Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968 - The State appealed an ad interim order dated 25.11.2025 passed by a Single Judge in WP.No.35227/2025 staying the operation of amended Rules 5 and 5-A, which introduced e‑auction and new licence forms for CL‑9 licences - The Court examined the challenge to the interim stay and the amended rules’ validity (Paras 1‑3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the learned Single Judge was justified in staying the operation, implementation and enforcement of the amended Rules 5 and 5-A of the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968, introduced by the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) (Second Amendment) Rules, 2025?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (KAR) (04) 12

WRIT APPEAL NO. 541 OF 2026 (EXCISE)

2026-04-15

Vibhu Bakhru, C.M. Poonacha

Shashi Kiran Shetty K., Prathima Honnapura, Namitha Mahesh B.G., Adoorya Harish, D.R. Ravishankar, Mohan Mahabaleshwara Bhat

The State of Karnataka & The Commissioner of Excise in Karnataka

Sri Guruswamy, Sri B. Govindaraj Hegde, Sri H.M. Nasir Hussain, Sri C.M. Gowda, Smt. Vishrutha Shetty

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against an interim order staying the implementation of amended excise rules regulating bar licences.

Remedy Sought

The State (appellants) sought to set aside the ad interim order dated 25.11.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP.No.35227/2025 (Excise).

Filing Reason

The Single Judge had stayed the operation, implementation and enforcement of amended Rules 5 and 5-A of the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968, introduced by the Second Amendment Rules, 2025, which the State contended was unwarranted.

Previous Decisions

The learned Single Judge passed an ad interim order dated 25.11.2025 staying the amended rules, pending further hearing.

Issues

Whether the interim order staying the operation of the amended excise rules was valid and justified.

Judgment Excerpts

The State has filed the present appeal impugning an ad interim order dated 25.11.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in WP.No.35227/2025 (EXCISE). By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has stayed the operation, implementation and enforcement of the amended Rules 5 and 5-A of the rules. The respondents (writ petitioners) had sought a declaration that the impugned Rules, which were published in the Gazette on 03.11.2025, are illegal, unreasonable, arbitrary, unconstitutional and ultra vires of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965.

Procedural History

The respondents (writ petitioners) were holders of CL-9 licences under the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968. Some had discontinued licences and sought renewal, which was rejected. They filed WP.No.35227/2025 challenging the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) (Second Amendment) Rules, 2025. On 25.11.2025, a Single Judge passed an ad interim order staying the operation of amended Rules 5 and 5-A. The State appealed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961. The appeal was heard and reserved for judgment, and was pronounced on 15.04.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: Section 4
  • Karnataka Excise Act, 1965:
  • Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968: Rule 2(i), Rule 2(ii), Rule 3, Rule 5, Rule 5-A, Rule 12
  • Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) (Second Amendment) Rules, 2025: Rule 2, Rule 3
  • Karnataka Excise (General Conditions of Licences) Rules, 1967: Rule 5(4), Rule 17A
  • Karnataka Excise (Lease of the Right of Retail Vend of Beer) Rules, 1976: Rule 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Interim Stay of Excise Rule Amendments. State Challenges Ad Interim Order Staying Amended Rules 5 and 5-A of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968, Introduced by Second Amendment Ru...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Trust Property Dispute — Declares Title and Possession in Favor of Religious Math. Suit for declaration and possession of trust property decreed as plaintiff Math proved ownership and defendant failed to est...