Search Results for "prior permissions"

786 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 786 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Draft Development Plan Publication and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Allege Irregularities in Municipal Corporation's Substitution of Plan and Ex Post Facto Extension Under Section 26.

The matter pertains to a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the notification dated 04.02.2016 published under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010662922011_1

The judgment is a common order in House Rent Revision Petition Nos. 136/2011 and 115/2011, and Regular First Appeal No. 160/2021. The appellant, Smt. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment in Writ Petition No.6998 of 2021 Addressing Consent Requirements Under MOFA for Construction on Amalgamated Land. The Court Framed Issues on Informed Consent Under Section 4 and Applicability of Section 7A of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963.

Background: The case involves a dispute over construction of an additional building 'E' in the 'Eves Garden' housing scheme at Mundhawa, Pune. The pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Protection of Sacred Groves/Orans in Rajasthan as Deemed Forests Under Forest Conservation Act, 1980. Recognizes Ecological and Cultural Significance of Community-Conserved Forests and Balances Community Rights with Conservation Goals.

The Supreme Court of India was hearing an interlocutory application in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India writ petition, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal by Adjacent Landowner in RERA Case — Locus Standi of Non-Allottee Denied. Project Completed Prior to RERA Act Not Required to Be Registered Under Section 3 of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

The appellant, Dr. Yogesh Keshav Bele, owned land adjacent to a project called 'Blue Heaven' developed by Respondent No. 3. He was not an allottee in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...