Bombay High Court Dismisses Injunction Application in Share Transfer Dispute — Agreement for Sale of Shares Not Enforceable as Contract for Sale of Shares, Not Specific Performance of Immovable Property. Court holds that agreement for transfer of shares is a contract for sale of goods and not for specific performance of immovable property, and plaintiff failed to show readiness and willingness.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 83
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Swaran Salaria & Associates, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 22 November 2007 with the first defendant, Himalayan Heli Service Pvt. Ltd., for acquisition of 50% stake in the defendant company. The plaintiff also sought an injunction restraining the defendants from transferring or alienating 52% shares in the first defendant company. The defendants opposed the motion, contending that the agreement was not binding and that the plaintiff had failed to show readiness and willingness. The court analyzed the nature of the agreement, holding that a contract for sale of shares is a contract for sale of goods and not for specific performance of immovable property. The court further held that the plaintiff had not pleaded or proved continuous readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract. Consequently, the court dismissed the notice of motion, finding no prima facie case or balance of convenience in favor of the plaintiff.

Headnote

A) Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 10 - Specific Performance of Contract for Sale of Shares - An agreement for transfer of shares is a contract for sale of goods and not for sale of immovable property; specific performance is not available as a matter of right unless the shares are unique or damages inadequate. (Paras 10-12)

B) Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 16(c) - Readiness and Willingness - Plaintiff must plead and prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract; failure to do so disentitles him to any relief. (Paras 13-15)

C) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 - Injunction - An injunction cannot be granted to restrain transfer of property when the underlying contract is not specifically enforceable and the plaintiff has not shown a prima facie case or balance of convenience. (Paras 16-18)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction restraining the defendants from transferring shares pending the suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell shares.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Notice of Motion dismissed with costs. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Law Points

  • Specific performance of contract for sale of shares is not enforceable as contract for sale of immovable property
  • Readiness and willingness must be continuous
  • Injunction cannot be granted to enforce a contract that is not specifically enforceable
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014:BHC-OS:13811

Notice of Motion No. 4938 of 2007 in Suit No. 3611 of 2007

2014-12-08

R.D. Dhanuka

2014:BHC-OS:13811

Mr. Pradeep Rajgopal a/w. Ms. Rekha Rajgopal, Debashree Mandpe i/by Ms. Rekha Rajgopal for the Plaintiff; Mr. Snehal Shah a/w. Mr. Harish Pandya, Mr. Vishal Talsania, Mr. Raj Mehta, Mr. Amish Parmar i/b. RKM Legal Services for Defendants

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for specific performance of agreement and injunction

Remedy Sought

Injunction restraining defendants from transferring shares and specific performance of agreement

Filing Reason

Alleged breach of agreement to acquire 50% stake in defendant company

Issues

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction restraining transfer of shares pending suit Whether the agreement for sale of shares is specifically enforceable

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that the agreement was binding and defendants were attempting to alienate shares Defendants contended that the agreement was not binding and plaintiff failed to show readiness and willingness

Ratio Decidendi

An agreement for transfer of shares is a contract for sale of goods and not for specific performance of immovable property; plaintiff must plead and prove continuous readiness and willingness to obtain specific performance; injunction cannot be granted to enforce a contract that is not specifically enforceable.

Judgment Excerpts

An agreement for transfer of shares is a contract for sale of goods and not for sale of immovable property. The plaintiff has not pleaded or proved continuous readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract.

Procedural History

Plaintiff filed suit for specific performance and injunction; defendants opposed notice of motion; court reserved judgment on 27 November 2014 and pronounced on 8 December 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Specific Relief Act, 1963: Section 10, Section 16(c)
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 39 Rules 1 and 2
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Due to Unexplained Delay in Proceedings — Preventive Action Must Be Decided with Utmost Despatch. The Court held that an unexplained delay of over two months between show cause notice and first hearing, an...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Injunction Application in Share Transfer Dispute — Agreement for Sale of Shares Not Enforceable as Contract for Sale of Shares, Not Specific Performance of Immovable Property. Court holds that agreement for transfer of s...