Search Results for "blood group evidence"

1210 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1210 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Ashok Kamble on 1/11/2011. The prosecution alleged that the three appellants, along with a juvenile, attacked the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Domestic Violence Case — Life Imprisonment for Killing Wife with Sickle. Appellant's Conviction Under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Confirmed Based on Credible Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Krishna Maruti Lohar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, for the murder of his wife Gangubai under Section 302...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Unnatural Offence Against Minor Victim Under Section 377 IPC. Medical Evidence and Testimony of Grandmother Sufficient to Prove Guilt Despite Minor Inconsistencies.

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Datta Digambar Ingle, who was convicted under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code for c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Stone Dropped on Head Constitutes Murder. Accused's Act of Dropping a Big Stone on Deceased's Head Held to be Intended to Cause Death, Not Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder.

The appellant, Pankaj @ Pintu Rajendra Marve, was convicted by the learned Extra Joint Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Trial No.14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Conspiracy Case Under IPC; Final Verdict Not Available in Extracted Text

The State of Maharashtra preferred a criminal appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay against the acquittal of nine accused in a murder a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Recovery of Weapon Not Linked to Accused; Last Seen and Motive Not Proved.

The present appeal arose from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Gadchiroli, convicting the appellant for offences under Sections 302, 392, and 201 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal in Criminal Case Involving Conviction Under Sections 376, 392, 452, 506 IPC. Accused-Appellant Challenges Trial Court's Finding of Guilt for Rape of Two Women and Related Offences.

The matter is a criminal appeal arising from the judgment of the District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in Sessions Case No. 320 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Ganpat Shingade. The appellants, including his wife Jyoti, were convicted under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as deceased's oral dying declaration to his wife was found credible and corroborated by medical evidence.

The appellant, Suresh Deshmukh, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Sonu, a relative, and sentenced to life imp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Incriminating Evidence. Court held that non-compliance with Section 52A of NDPS Act and absence of contraband recovery from accused Nos. 4, 5, and 6 entitled them to bail.

The Bombay High Court heard four bail applications arising from the same crime under the NDPS Act. The applicants were accused of involvement in a dru...