High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal in Criminal Case Involving Conviction Under Sections 376, 392, 452, 506 IPC. Accused-Appellant Challenges Trial Court's Finding of Guilt for Rape of Two Women and Related Offences.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter is a criminal appeal arising from the judgment of the District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in Sessions Case No. 320 of 2011, convicting the appellant Vijay @ Ajay Murlidhar Dalvi for offences under the Indian Penal Code. The trial court found the appellant guilty of two counts of rape under Section 376 IPC, along with offences under Sections 392 (robbery), 452 (house-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint), and 506 (criminal intimidation). The prosecution case involved two incidents that occurred on the night of 9th August, 2011, in village Gunwadi. The first prosecutrix, Ranjana Shelke (aged 50), was alone in her hut when the appellant entered through the roof at about 10.00 p.m., threatened her with a knife, extorted Rs.5,000, removed the electric bulb, and committed rape. He also threatened her with dire consequences if she disclosed the incident. Ranjana subsequently informed her relatives and lodged a complaint at Nagar Taluka Police Station, leading to registration of Crime No. 141 of 2011 under Sections 376, 392 and 457 IPC. Later the same night, between 1.00 a.m. and 2.00 a.m., the appellant entered the hut of a second prosecutrix, Kashibai Parbhane (aged 55), by opening the latch, threatened her, and raped her. Kashibai also reported the matter after narrating it to her nephew. The appellant was arrested, medical examinations of both victims and the appellant were conducted, and exhibits including clothes and samples were sent for chemical analysis. The trial court, after examining 11 witnesses including the two prosecutrixes, panch witnesses, and medical officers, convicted the appellant and sentenced him to ten years' rigorous imprisonment for each rape (to run consecutively), along with concurrent sentences for the other offences. The appellant preferred Criminal Appeal No. 348 of 2013 before the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad. The High Court heard the appeal and reserved judgment on 14th June 2018, later pronouncing it on 22nd June 2018. The excerpt provided does not include the court's analysis or final decision.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 376, 392, 452, 506 of the Indian Penal Code by the trial court is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (06) 35

Criminal Appeal No. 348 of 2013

2018-06-22

S.S. Shinde, V.K. Jadhav

M.B. Kolpe, D.R. Kale

Vijay @ Ajay Murlidhar Dalvi

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for offences under Indian Penal Code.

Remedy Sought

Appellant seeks acquittal by setting aside the trial court's judgment of conviction.

Filing Reason

The appellant was convicted by the trial court for rape and other offences, hence this appeal.

Previous Decisions

District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar convicted the appellant on 26th February, 2013 in Sessions Case No.320 of 2011.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Sections 376, 392, 452, 506 IPC is justified based on the prosecution evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

On 9th August, 2011, husband of Ranjana Shelke i.e. Sahebrao Shelke went to another village to meet his daughter Yamuna and so Ranjana was alone in the house. the trial Court convicted the accusedAppellant for the the offence of rape upon Ranjana Shelke, punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years

Procedural History

The incident occurred on 9th August 2011. Ranjana Shelke lodged a complaint at Nagar Taluka Police Station leading to registration of Crime No.141 of 2011. Investigation was conducted, and accused was arrested. Chargesheet was filed before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ahmednagar, who committed the case to the Sessions Court. The trial was conducted as Sessions Case No.320 of 2011. On 26th February 2013, the trial court convicted the appellant. The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.348 of 2013 in the High Court. The appeal was heard, judgment reserved on 14th June 2018, and pronounced on 22nd June 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code: 376, 392, 452, 506, 324, 457
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Life Convict's Petition Seeking Premature Release After 14 Years. Court Holds That Categorization Under 1992 Guidelines As Category 3(d) Requiring 26 Years Imprisonment Is Proper and Not Arbitrary.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) Dismisses Civil Revision Application Concerning Succession Certificate and Will Proof under Indian Succession Act, 1925. Court Holds That Strict Burden of Proof Not Required in Summary Proceedings and...