Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as deceased's oral dying declaration to his wife was found credible and corroborated by medical evidence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Suresh Deshmukh, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Sonu, a relative, and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola. The prosecution case was that on 5 August 2012, the deceased went to the appellant's house to recover a debt. The deceased's wife, Maya, sent their daughter Chhakuli to check on him, who returned saying her father was lying in a pool of blood. Maya rushed to the spot and found her husband with injuries. On her inquiry, the deceased told her that the appellant had beaten him with a stone. She took him to the hospital, where he was declared brought dead. The trial court relied on the oral dying declaration of the deceased to his wife, corroborated by medical evidence, to convict the appellant. The appellant challenged the conviction, arguing that the dying declaration was unreliable. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the dying declaration was made voluntarily, was consistent, and was corroborated by the medical evidence showing injuries consistent with a blunt object. The court held that the dying declaration was credible and sufficient to sustain the conviction. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Dying Declaration - Section 302 IPC, Section 32(1) Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - The deceased made an oral dying declaration to his wife naming the appellant as the assailant and stating that he was beaten with a stone - The court held that the dying declaration was credible, consistent, and corroborated by medical evidence showing injuries caused by a blunt object - Conviction upheld (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code based on the oral dying declaration of the deceased is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial No.152 of 2012, dt.13.11.2014 are confirmed.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • Section 32(1) of Indian Evidence Act
  • 1872
  • credibility of oral dying declaration
  • corroboration by medical evidence
  • conviction based on dying declaration alone
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (09) 178

Criminal Appeal No.7 of 2015

2017-09-05

Smt. Vasanti A Naik, M.G. Giratkar

None for the Appellant, Mr. A.M. Deshpande, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State

Suresh s/o. Mahadeo Deshmukh

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for murder

Previous Decisions

Additional Sessions Judge, Akola convicted the appellant in Sessions Trial No.152 of 2012 on 13.11.2014

Issues

Whether the oral dying declaration of the deceased is credible and sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 IPC

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declaration was unreliable State argued that the dying declaration was credible and corroborated by medical evidence

Ratio Decidendi

An oral dying declaration made to a close relative, if found credible, consistent, and corroborated by medical evidence, is sufficient to sustain a conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant has challenged the Judgment of conviction awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial No.152 of 2012, dt.13.11.2014, by which he is sentenced to suffer life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. On the complainant asking her husband/deceased, he replied that he was beaten by accused Suresh. He replied that the accused beat him by stone.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola on 13.11.2014 in Sessions Trial No.152 of 2012 for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which heard the appeal and dismissed it on 5.9.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as deceased's oral dying declaration to his wife was found credible and corroborated by medical ...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Case Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Driver. Truck driver died after colliding with a parked trailer; court apportioned 40% contributory negligence on deceased for not noticing stat...