Search Results for "bank withdrawal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "bank withdrawal"

1169 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1169 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India in Jurisdictional Dispute Over Trial of IBC Offences. Held that Reference to Special Court under Chapter XXVIII of Companies Act, 2013 in Section 236(1) IBC is Legislation by Incorporation, Not Affected by Subsequent Amendment.

29 Apr 2024

The appeal arises from a challenge by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court quashing the o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Developer in Consumer Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance of Refund Order. Held that Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is penal in nature and bail should be granted liberally unless there is likelihood of abscondence or tampering with evidence.

23 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, a developer, was involved in a consumer dispute with the respondent, Dhanraj Tulshiram Khaparde, who had paid Rs...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Employees Provident Fund Pension Fraud Case Due to Misrepresentation and Non-Disclosure. Petitioner's Failure to Disclose Earlier Pension in Form 10-D and Application for Early Pension While in Subsequent Employment Constituted Fraud Under Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and Employees Pension Scheme, 1995.

5 Mar 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition concerning allegations of pension fraud under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellane...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Withdrawal of Compensation Amount in Workmen's Compensation Case — Labour Court's Rejection Set Aside. Claimant Entitled to Withdraw Deposited Compensation Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

5 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Chetanbhai Kishorbhai Sindhvad, filed a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, before the Labour Court, Rajkot, in WC (NF) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Writ Petition as Dispute Settled Between Parties. Petitioner settled dispute with respondents and sought withdrawal; court permitted withdrawal and disposed of petition as withdrawn.

28 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Vinod Biharilal Narang, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, against the State of Maharashtra and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court's Order Condoning Delay in Industrial Dispute Claim. The court held that the three-year limitation under Section 2A(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is not a bar to condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

3 Mar 2016

The petitioner, M/S ITC Infotech India Ltd., challenged an order dated 17.03.2015 passed by the III Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru, in I.D.No.6/20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court heard cross-appeals from NCLAT order partly reversing NCLT’s finding on trademark ownership during CIRP; cross-appeal challenged NCLT’s jurisdiction to determine title under Section 60(5) IBC.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute originated in the corporate insolvency resolution process of Fort Gloster Industries Limited (corporate debtor), which was admitted into C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Redevelopment Dispute; Developer Challenges Directions to Amend Building Plans and Pay Compensation. Court's Decision Awaited.

13 Jan 2026

The dispute pertained to redevelopment of a cooperative housing society's property. The respondent society, owner of a plot in Andheri, Mumbai, appoin...

45 46 47 48 49

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)