Gujarat High Court Allows Withdrawal of Compensation Amount in Workmen's Compensation Case — Labour Court's Rejection Set Aside. Claimant Entitled to Withdraw Deposited Compensation Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Chetanbhai Kishorbhai Sindhvad, filed a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, before the Labour Court, Rajkot, in WC (NF) No. 5/2016. The Labour Court allowed the claim on 27.02.2023, and the respondent, National Insurance Co. Ltd., deposited Rs. 1,26,098/- in compliance. The petitioner then applied for withdrawal of the amount, which was lying in fixed deposit. However, the Labour Court rejected the application on 15.02.2024. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The High Court heard the counsels and perused the record. The Court found that the Labour Court's rejection was unjustified as the amount was awarded to the claimant and he was entitled to withdraw it. The Court quashed the impugned order and directed the Labour Court or the concerned bank to allow the claimant to withdraw the amount. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Workmen's Compensation - Withdrawal of Compensation Amount - Section 4 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - The petitioner, a workman, was awarded compensation by the Labour Court, which was deposited by the insurance company in fixed deposit. The Labour Court rejected the petitioner's application for withdrawal. The High Court held that the Labour Court erred in rejecting the application as the amount was awarded to the claimant and he was entitled to withdraw it. The impugned order was quashed and set aside, and the Labour Court was directed to allow the claimant to withdraw the amount. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Labour Court was justified in rejecting the claimant's application for withdrawal of the compensation amount deposited in fixed deposit.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 15.02.2024 passed by the Labour Court, Rajkot in WC (NF) No. 5/2016 is quashed and set aside. The Labour Court/concerned bank is directed to allow the claimant to withdraw the amount lying in fixed deposit. Rule is made absolute. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Workmen's Compensation Act
  • 1923
  • Section 4
  • Withdrawal of compensation
  • Fixed deposit
  • Labour Court jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 1000

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15853 of 2025

2026-03-05

Hemant M. Prachchhak

2026:GUJHC:17801

Smit R. Parekh, Nishit A. Bhalodi, Krupali N. Bhatt

Chetanbhai Kishorbhai Sindhvad

National Insurance Co. Ltd

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil writ petition challenging Labour Court order rejecting withdrawal of compensation amount.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of Labour Court order dated 15.02.2024 and direction to allow withdrawal of fixed deposit amount.

Filing Reason

Labour Court rejected claimant's application for withdrawal of compensation amount deposited in fixed deposit.

Previous Decisions

Labour Court allowed claim on 27.02.2023; insurance company deposited Rs. 1,26,098/-; Labour Court rejected withdrawal application on 15.02.2024.

Issues

Whether the Labour Court erred in rejecting the claimant's application for withdrawal of the compensation amount deposited in fixed deposit.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the amount was awarded to him and he was entitled to withdraw it. Respondent did not oppose the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

A claimant awarded compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act is entitled to withdraw the amount deposited in fixed deposit, and the Labour Court cannot reject such application without valid reason.

Judgment Excerpts

The Labour Court vide order dated 27.02.2023 allowed the claim of the petitioner and the respondent – Insurance Co. deposited an amount of Rs.1,26,098/- in compliance with the order dated 27.02.2023. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 15.02.2024 passed by the Labour Court, Rajkot, the petitioner has preferred the present petition.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed WC (NF) No. 5/2016 before Labour Court, Rajkot. Labour Court allowed claim on 27.02.2023. Insurance company deposited Rs. 1,26,098/-. Petitioner applied for withdrawal; Labour Court rejected on 15.02.2024. Petitioner filed present writ petition on 2025. High Court allowed petition on 05.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923: Section 4
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Reduction of Sick Leave by IDBI Bank. The court held that the reduction of sick leave from 540 to 360 days was a valid policy decision and not arbitrary under Article 14 of the Constitution of Ind...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Awards Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Deposit of Compensation in Government ...