Search Results for "advocate eligibility"

1800 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1800 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows PILs Challenging Vice-Chancellor Appointment Due to Flawed Qualification Assessment. Search Committee's Non-Application of Mind to Essential Qualifications under Statutory Order Issued under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Vitiated Selection.

The dispute arose from the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Mumbai, which was assailed through three public interest litigation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses PILs and Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Vice-Chancellor Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. Court Holds That UGC Regulations 2010 Not Adopted by University, and Search Committee and Chancellor’s Decision Not Vitiated by Illegality or Mala Fides.

The litigation arose out of three petitions—two public interest litigations and one writ petition—challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Vice-Chancellor Appointment Under UGC Regulations and Maharashtra Universities Act. Challenge Focuses on Applicability of UGC Regulations 2010 and Discretion of Chancellor in Selecting Vice-Chancellor.

The petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as Vice-Chancellor of the University of Mumbai by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds 2020 Tribunal Rules with Modifications to Ensure Judicial Independence. Court directs changes to Search-cum-Selection Committee composition and member qualifications to align with constitutional principles.

The Supreme Court of India was called upon to decide the constitutional validity of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualificat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Age Limit Rule for District Judge Recruitment — Rule 5(3) of Karnataka Judicial Service (Recruitment) Rules, 2004 Held Valid. Petitioner's challenge to age bar of 35 years for direct recruitment dismissed as reasonable classification under Articles 14 and 16.

The petitioner, Vijaya Kumar, applied for the post of District Judge under the Karnataka Judicial Service (Recruitment) Rules, 2004, pursuant to a not...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Adjustment Case — Held that ITAT Correctly Deleted Addition for Non-Compete Fee Paid to AE Without Adequate Justification. The court found no substantial question of law as the Tribunal's findings were factual and not perverse.

The Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax) filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Pronounced Order on Writ Petitions Challenging Railway Catering Policy Addendum. Petitioners Contended That Addendum Required Cabinet Approval, While Respondents Defended It as Within Competence and for Hygiene Improvement.

The South Western Railway Catering Contractors Association, a registered body of railway catering contractors, filed two writ petitions under Articles...