Search Results for "additional benefits"

3717 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3717 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Employer's Writ Petition Against Labour Court Order Allowing Workman's Claim for Full Wages under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Maintainability of an Individual Workman's Application after Settlement by Other Workmen Examined.

The petitioner, Mulberry Silks Ltd, a company engaged in silk fabric manufacturing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension to University Employee with 33 Years of Service Despite Temporary Appointments and Breaks. Continuous Service Under Rule 33 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, Includes Temporary Service Followed by Confirmation.

The petitioner, a chemistry teacher, served Savitribai Phule Pune University from 1993 until her retirement on 30 April 2016, completing over 33 years...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal of Employees Union in ONGC Regularization Case. Court Holds That Irregularly Appointed Term Employees Are Entitled to Regularization from Date of Initial Appointment but Only Notional Benefits Retrospectively and Actual Pay from Date of High Court Order.

The dispute arose from the appointment of about 800 term-based employees by Oil & Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) between 1999 and 2001 for Class III a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.2063 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in MEIS Export Incentive Case — Policy Relaxation Committee's Rejection Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind. Amendment of Shipping Bills Under Section 149 of Customs Act, 1962 Held Valid and Binding on DGFT for Grant of MEIS Benefits.

The petitioner, Technocraft Industries (India) Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, manufactures scaffolding steel products ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of ESI Contributions Paid Under Mistake of Law — Employer Entitled to Restitution Under Section 72 of Indian Contract Act. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Claim for Refund Under Section 75 of ESI Act, 1948.

The petitioners, M/s. Indian Hotels Co. Limited (owner of Taj Mahal Hotel and Taj Intercontinental) and its shareholder, filed a writ petition seeking...