Search Results for "Railway service"

1556 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1556 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Eviction Order in Caretaker Agreement Dispute. Licensee Not Entitled to Tenancy Protection Under Section 15A of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 as Agreement Was Not Bona Fide.

The case involves a dispute over Flat No.5, Sagar Mahal, Walkeshwar Road, Mumbai. The respondent, Dr. G.S. Shah, a medical doctor employed with Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Challenge to Labour Court and Gratuity Proceedings. Ex-Manager's Claims Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act and Payment of Gratuity Act Dismissed as Society is Neither an 'Industry' Nor an 'Establishment'.

The Petitioner, Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is a cooperative housing society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment to Unmarried Daughter Despite Marriage After Death of Employee — Widow's Application for Daughter's Appointment Maintainable Under GR Dated 20.05.2002

The petitioners, the widow and unmarried daughter of deceased government employee Mohan Kulkarni, filed a writ petition seeking compassionate appointm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Octroi/LBT Levy on Meal Vouchers — Vouchers Not Goods Under Municipal Law. Meal Vouchers Issued Under Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 Are Not Goods for Levy of Octroi or Local Body Tax Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The Bombay High Court addressed two writ petitions filed by Sodexo SVC India Private Limited challenging the levy of octroi and Local Body Tax (LBT) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Validity of Ahmedpur Development Plan Notification Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Core Issue Involves Mandatory or Directory Nature of Section 26(1) Timeline and Permissible Limits of Extension Under Third Proviso.

The case involved three writ petitions filed by landowners in Ahmedpur, District Latur, challenging a notification dated 29.03.2012 published on 08.05...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...