Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Petitions Seeking to Quash Private Complaint and FIR for Offences Under Sections 354A, 500, 506, 120B IPC. Multiple Accused Challenge the Proceedings as Abuse of Process of Law.
9 Aug 2024...
Search Results for "Private property"
5523 result(s) found
Found 5523 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.
9 Oct 2015The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...
- 200
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows BSFC Appeal, Upholds Auction Sale Under Section 29 of SFC Act Despite Concurrent Findings of Trial Court and High Court. Borrower's Persistent Default and Failure to Discharge Liability Justifies Corporation's Statutory Power to Sell Mortgaged Property Without Interference by Civil Court.
1 Jan 2026The case involves an appeal by the Bihar State Financial Corporation (BSFC) against a judgment of the Patna High Court which affirmed a trial court de...
- 118
High Court
KAHC010212612022_1
15 Jul 2022The criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed before the High Court of Karnataka seeking to quash FIR No....
- 27
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Order on Petitions to Quash FIRs in Joint Development Project Dispute. Petitions Challenge Three Separate Criminal Proceedings for Breach of Agreement, Cheating, Forgery, and Bribery in Procurement of Occupancy Certificate for Residential Villa Project.
5 Apr 2024The High Court of Karnataka heard three criminal petitions filed by Sri Aditya Kankaria, a director of M/s KSM Niketan Pvt. Ltd., seeking quashing of ...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Whether Temporary Injunction to Restrain Alienation Pending Suit is Necessary Despite Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The Court Revisits Its Earlier Decision in Sharad Mor's Case in the Context of Multiple Appeals from Orders Refusing Injunctions.
3 Aug 2010These appeals raised a common question about the necessity of granting a temporary injunction to restrain a defendant from creating third party intere...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Acquits Forest Officer in Murder Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Failure to Prove Incident Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Manner of Occurrence.
7 Mar 2019The appellant, Sukumaran, a Forest Range Officer, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri, for offences under Sections 302 and 203 ...
- 182
High Court
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Orders Against Former Directors in GST Case — Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed Without Shedding Corporate Veil. Directors Who Resigned Prior to Tax Period Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Dues Under MGST Act, BST Act, and CST Act Without Lifting Corporate Veil.
22 Aug 2022The petitioners, Mukesh D. Ramani, Satish D. Sanghavi, and Prakash D. Sanghavi, were former directors of Twin City Organics Pvt. Ltd. They filed writ ...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitrator’s Interim Order in Film Remake Rights Case. Dispute Involves Enforcement of Agreement Dated 24 January 2012 Granting Remake Rights of Film 'Zanjeer' and Payment of Instalments.
3 Apr 2013The petition was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim order dated 16 July 2012 passed by the l...
- 36
