Search Results for "Delay Condone"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Delay Condone"

1009 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1009 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses BSNL's Delay Condonation Applications in Section 34 Arbitration Petitions — Delay Beyond 30 Days Not Condonable Under Section 34(3) Proviso. The court strictly interpreted Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that delays exceeding 30 days beyond the three-month limitation period cannot be condoned, leading to dismissal of multiple arbitration petitions.

20 Aug 2019

The judgment concerns multiple notices of motion filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) seeking condonation of delay in filing arbitration petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of Delay in Appeal Due to Gross Negligence — Delay of Almost Three Years Condoned Without Imposing Costs Despite Abundant Material Showing Negligence. The court held that the lower Appellate Court failed to consider material showing gross negligence and did not impose costs, rendering the order unsustainable.

29 Apr 2005

The petitioners, Smt. Sitabai Ramrao Shirodkar and others, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging an order dated 18th Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Complaint Dismissed in Default in Labour Dispute — Emphasizes Liberal Approach Over Hyper-Technicality. Delay of 85 Days Condoned, Restoration Application Rejected on Merits Without Considering Conduct or Prejudice.

8 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Shri Sakharam Ashruba Sanap, filed a complaint (ULP No. 78 of 2001) before the Labour Court challenging his termination from employmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Condoned Delay of 2192 Days in Filing Central Excise Appeal Due to Bona Fide Prosecution in Wrong Forum — Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963 Applied to Exclude Time Spent in Gujarat High Court. The appellant acted with due diligence in pursuing the appeal before the Gujarat High Court, which was dismissed for lack of territorial jurisdiction under Section 36(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

22 Feb 2016

The Principal Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Daman Commissionerate, filed a Notice of Motion seeking condonation of a 2192-day delay in fil...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Application for Condonation of Delay in Civil Appeal Due to Insufficient Cause and Lack of Supporting Documents. Delay of 1938 Days Not Condoned as Applicant Failed to Provide Evidence for Paralysis, Old Age, and Advocate Inaction Claims Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

17 Mar 2026

The case involved an interim application filed by Appellant seeking condonation of delay of 1938 days in filing a first appeal against a judgment and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Arbitration Petition. Delay of 24 Days in Filing Section 34 Petition Condoned as Petition Filed Within 120 Days and Exparte Award Justifies Opportunity to Contest on Merits.

7 Feb 2017

The appellant, Mr. Dhanpal Tamanna Gulavane, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an order dated 20 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Challenging High Court's Setting Aside of Ex Parte Decree in Specific Performance Suit. High Court's Intervention Under Article 227 Upheld as Ex Parte Decree Was Nullity Due to Non-Appointment of Guardian for Minor Defendant Under Order XXXII Rule 3 CPC, Despite Defendants' Negligence and Delay.

16 Jul 2021

The dispute originated from a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement, where the plaintiffs obtained an ex parte decree against the defendan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of Delay in Gratuity Appeal — Delay Beyond 120 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Section 7(7) First Proviso Imposes Absolute Bar on Entertaining Appeal Filed After 120 Days from Receipt of Controlling Authority's Order.

5 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Changunabai Sambhaji Gaware, a retired employee, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Industrial Court dated 18.11.2014,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Condon 902-Day Delay in Setting Aside Ex-Parte Order. Delay of 902 days in seeking to set aside order 'Suit to proceed without written statement' not sufficiently explained; Court upholds trial court's refusal to condone delay.

22 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Rupchand Rajmalji Jain (Sancheti), was defendant No.2 in a suit filed before the City Civil Court, Mumbai. The suit was originally fil...

45 46 47 48 49

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)