Search Results for "section 391"

574 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 574 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case — Assessing Officer's Order Not Erroneous Under Section 263. Commissioner Cannot Substitute View Where Assessing Officer Applied Mind and Took Plausible View on Depreciation of Current Investments by Bank.

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 15 January 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Recovery Officer's Confirmation of Private Sale. Court Holds That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Possession Delivered, Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages, Not in Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Shaikh Gulab Shaikh Ahmed and Ambadas Maruti Kale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Orders in Kachchh District for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Notice Under Land Revenue Code. Orders Passed Without Hearing Petitioner Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

The petitioner, Kirit Mulji Shah, filed two Special Civil Applications under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging three orders passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes ESIC Complaint Against Director for Non-Payment of Contribution Under Section 85(A) of ESI Act — Complaint Filed Without Proper Sanction and Authorization. Director Cannot Be Held Vicariously Liable Without Specific Averment of Role in Day-to-Day Management.

The petitioner, Mr. Naseer Ahmed, a director of M/s Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited-Unit 16, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...