Search Results for "retirement gratuity"

597 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 597 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Bus Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs. 18,91,600 with 7.5% Interest Affirmed Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Death of Motorcyclist.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the widow and son of Kashinath Zanje, who died in a road accident on 21 February 2015. The deceas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Pensionary Benefits from Retired Class III Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute. Recovery of Rs.77,446/- directed after 17 years of pay fixation without misrepresentation by employee held unsustainable.

The petitioner, Devidas Marotirao Kandhare, a retired junior clerk (Class III) under the Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Granting Retirement Benefits Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Computation of Gratuity and Pension as per Settlement and Rules Upheld.

The petitioner, Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), Nagpur, challenged the order dated 3.3.2008 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim in MFA No. 894 of 2020. Claimant awarded Rs. 2,50,000/- for injuries sustained in road accident under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant-claimant, Sri Milind Kunale, filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Insurance Company, Holds Mediclaim Amount Not Deductible from Motor Accident Compensation. Contractual Insurance Benefit Is Independent of Statutory Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and Cannot Be Deducted to Avoid Double Recovery.

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the question whether amounts received by a claimant under a Mediclaim policy are deductible from the compe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order as Violative of Service Rules and Natural Justice. Transfer of Regional Manager to Mumbai set aside for non-compliance with Section 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and breach of principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Ramesh Janardhan Meshram, a retired Regional Manager of Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe Development Corporation, challenged his transfer orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Workman Retrenched Due to Computerization. Introduction of computers does not constitute a valid ground for retrenchment without compliance with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging a common award of the Labour Court dated 19th September 2002. The workman, Mohammed Asad Khan,...