Search Results for "illegal electricity connection"

473 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 473 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Non-Delivery of Shares and Limitation Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

The appellant, M/s Satish K. Narang & Co., an investor, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Bank Guarantee Dispute. Court upholds restraint on encashment of bank guarantee subject to deposit of amount, finding no perversity in the Tribunal's order under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Mahaguj Collieries Limited, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds Tribunal's power to grant interim relief under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but modifies order to balance interests of both parties.

The judgment arises from two commercial arbitration petitions filed by Mahaguj Collieries Limited (the petitioner) under Section 37 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Possession Dispute - Applicant Challenge to Decree Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act Fails - Trial Court's Order Restoring Possession Upheld

The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Application filed by the Applicant-Defendant challenging the Trial Court's decree in Special Civil Suit No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Remand Order in Private Complaint Case. The court held that once cognizance is taken and process issued under Section 204 CrPC, the Magistrate cannot be directed to conduct a re-enquiry under Section 202 CrPC.

The petitioner, Mrs. Jessie Mary Fernandes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ of Mandamus to Remove Encroachments on Public Amenity Land in Coimbatore Layout. OSR Land Sale Held Void; Regularisation of Plot Does Not Validate Encroachment on Common Area.

The petitioner, D. Satishkumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Berth Reservation Agreement — Restores Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s.X-Press Container Lines (UK) Ltd., entered into a Berth Reservation Agreement with the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Por...