Search Results for "Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority"

2823 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2823 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to ISP in Section 9 Arbitration Application, Restraining OTT Platform from Suspending Internet Services to 22,000+ Subscribers. Court holds that MOU creates binding obligations and balance of convenience favors continuity of services pending arbitration.

The applicant, World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. (WPISPL), a Delhi-based Class A Unified License ISP, filed an application under Section 9 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reservation for SC/ST in Direct Recruitment to District Judge Posts — Backlog Vacancies Filled by Lowering Cut-Off Marks Valid Under Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) of the Constitution.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by general category candidates challenging the decision of the High Court of Judicature at Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Bid in Tender for ACP Sheets — No Arbitrariness Found in MSRTC's Decision to Reject L-2 Bidder's Price Match Offer After L-1 Withdrawal.

The Petitioner, Unistone Panels Pvt. Ltd., and its director Lalit Mittal, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...