Search Results for "Maharashtra Police Act, 1951"

624 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 624 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Show Cause Notice Under Section 59 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 Must Afford Meaningful Hearing Before Externment Under Section 56.

The petitioner, Rajesh Jiwan Jangle, a businessman running a hotel and owning a godown in Nagpur, challenged an externment order passed by the Deputy ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Woman for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Compliance with Section 59 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The court held that externment orders cannot be based on vague allegations and must be supported by proper application of mind.

The petitioner, Smt. Smita Suryakant Ashtekar @ Smita Deepak Kumbhare, a 35-year-old social worker from Ahmednagar, challenged an externment order pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Bombay Police Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Externment order under Section 56(1)(b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951 set aside as show-cause notice and order were based on stale and irrelevant incidents without considering the petitioner's explanation.

The petitioner, Praful Bhausaheb Yadav, a cable operator by profession, filed a writ petition challenging an externment order passed under Section 56(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Section 55 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 for Non-Supply of Material and Lack of Sufficient Evidence Against Gang Member. Court Held That Externment Order Based on Inadequate Material and Denial of Copies of Reports Violated Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Ahammad Mainuddin Shaikh, challenged the legality of an externment order dated 15th January, 2013 passed by the Superintendent of Poli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioner for Lack of Sufficient Material Under Section 56(1)(a) and (b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951. Single Criminal Case and Stereotype In-Camera Statements Held Insufficient to Justify Draconian Restriction on Right to Move Freely.

The petitioner, Pramila Anand Sing, challenged an externment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-X, Mumbai, dated 2nd December 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Victim's Appeal in SC/ST Atrocity Case Due to Cursory High Court Order. High Court Failed to Re-appreciate Evidence in Appeal Against Acquittal Under Sections 3(1)(x) and 3(1)(xi) of SC/ST Act and Sections 354, 504, 506 IPC.

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order dismissing the victim's appeal against acquittal under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Section 56 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 Due to Vague Material and Excessive Externment. Court Held That Externment Based on Stale and Minor Offences Without Live Link Is Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Sheikh Hussain @ Sheikh Lakhan Sheikh Ibrahim, a tea stall owner from Chandkha Plot, Akola, challenged an externment order passed by t...