Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against District Health Officer in Cash and Liquor Case — No Offence Made Out Under Sections 188, 269, 270 IPC and NDPS Act. Court holds that carrying cash from agricultural sale proceeds and possessing liquor with valid licence does not constitute any criminal offence, and the FIR was lodged on a false tip-off due to marital discord.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Dr. Amol Rambhau Gite, a District Health Officer in Aurangabad, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.0158/2020 registered at Badnapur Police Station, District Jalna. The FIR was lodged on 18.04.2020, alleging offences under Sections 188, 269, 270 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)(A) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, along with other provisions. The applicant was on duty to combat the Covid-19 pandemic and had planned to visit inspection spots. He was carrying Rs.6,50,000/- in cash, which was the sale proceeds of his father's agricultural produce, and two units of foreign liquor, for which he held a valid licence issued by the State Excise Department. His father also had a valid liquor licence. The applicant intended to hand over the cash and liquor to his father at a check post on the Aurangabad-Jalna Highway for the purpose of purchasing agricultural land. The applicant alleged that his wife, with whom he had marital discord and who had filed divorce proceedings, gave a false tip-off to the police that a car was coming with 'Havala' money. The police intercepted the applicant's vehicle and seized the cash and liquor, registering the FIR. The applicant contended that the FIR was a gross abuse of process of law, as no offence was made out. The court examined the allegations and found that the applicant was a public servant on duty during the pandemic, the cash was from legitimate agricultural proceeds, and the liquor was possessed under a valid licence. The court held that Sections 188, 269, and 270 IPC were not attracted as there was no disobedience of any order, nor any act likely to spread infection. The NDPS Act was also not attracted as no narcotic substance was recovered. The court concluded that the FIR was lodged on a false tip-off due to personal vendetta and that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process. Accordingly, the court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Abuse of Process - FIR lodged on false tip-off due to marital discord - Applicant, a District Health Officer, was carrying Rs.6,50,000/- (agricultural sale proceeds of his father) and two units of foreign liquor (valid licence) during Covid-19 duty - Held that no offence under Sections 188, 269, 270 IPC or NDPS Act is made out, and continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law (Paras 1-11).

B) Indian Penal Code - Offences against Public Health - Sections 269, 270 IPC - Negligent/Malignant Act likely to spread infection - Applicant was on duty to fight Covid-19 pandemic and was not spreading infection - Carrying cash and liquor does not attract these sections - Held that no prima facie case exists (Paras 8-10).

C) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)(A) - Possession of Ganja - No recovery of any narcotic substance - Only foreign liquor recovered, which is not covered under NDPS Act - Held that NDPS Act is not attracted (Para 10).

D) Indian Penal Code - Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant - Section 188 IPC - No order prohibiting carrying of cash or liquor was violated - Applicant had valid licence for liquor - Held that no offence under Section 188 IPC is made out (Para 9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR registered against the applicant for offences under Sections 188, 269, 270 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)(A) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, and other provisions, deserves to be quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed FIR No.0158/2020 registered at Badnapur Police Station, District Jalna, and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Abuse of process of law
  • No prima facie case
  • Marital discord leading to false complaint
  • Valid liquor licence
  • Agricultural sale proceeds not illegal
  • Covid-19 pandemic duty
  • Sections 188
  • 269
  • 270 IPC
  • NDPS Act not attracted
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (06) 2

Criminal Application No. 1036 of 2020

2020-06-30

T. V. Nalawade, Shrikant D. Kulkarni

Sambhaji S Tope for the applicant, A.V. Deshmukh, APP for the respondents/State

Dr Amol s/o Rambhau Gite

The State of Maharashtra through the Investigating Officer, Police Station, Badnapur, Dist. Jalna and Shivsing s/o Suppadsing Bahure

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.0158/2020 registered at Badnapur Police Station, District Jalna, and all consequential proceedings

Filing Reason

The applicant, a District Health Officer, was falsely implicated in an FIR based on a tip-off from his estranged wife due to marital discord, alleging illegal possession of cash and liquor, whereas the cash was agricultural sale proceeds and the liquor was possessed under a valid licence.

Issues

Whether the FIR and proceedings against the applicant under Sections 188, 269, 270 IPC and NDPS Act deserve to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC? Whether the allegations in the FIR make out any prima facie offence against the applicant?

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant submitted that he is a District Health Officer on duty to fight Covid-19 pandemic, the cash of Rs.6,50,000/- was his father's agricultural sale proceeds, and he had a valid liquor licence. The FIR was lodged on a false tip-off by his wife due to marital discord, and no offence is made out. The respondent/State opposed the application, arguing that the FIR discloses cognizable offences and the investigation should be allowed to proceed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the FIR did not disclose any prima facie offence under Sections 188, 269, 270 IPC or under the NDPS Act. The cash was from legitimate agricultural sale proceeds, the liquor was possessed under a valid licence, and the applicant was on duty during the Covid-19 pandemic. The FIR was based on a false tip-off due to marital discord, and continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law. Hence, the FIR was liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The applicant/the District Health Officer, Aurangabad is seeking relief to quash the First Information Report registered against him vide No.0158/2020 at Badnapur Police Station, District Jalna, by taking aid of section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. According to the applicant, he is working as District Health Officer with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. On 18.04.2020, he was on duty to fight against Covid-19 pandemic and had planned to visit spots for inspection. The applicant has valid licence to purchase, carry and consume liquor, issued by the State Excise Department. There is marital discord between the applicant and his wife. His wife, who had filed divorce proceedings, gave tip to the police that a Car is coming with an amount of Havala. The court held that no offence under Sections 188, 269, 270 IPC or NDPS Act is made out, and the FIR is quashed.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application No. 1036 of 2020 under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking quashing of FIR No.0158/2020 registered at Badnapur Police Station, District Jalna. The court heard both sides and delivered judgment on 30.06.2020, allowing the application and quashing the FIR.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 188, 269, 270
  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act): 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(A)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Nomination Acceptance in Cooperative Society Elections. Managing Committee Supersession Under Section 78(1) of MCS Act Disqualifies Members from Contesting.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against District Health Officer in Cash and Liquor Case — No Offence Made Out Under Sections 188, 269, 270 IPC and NDPS Act. Court holds that carrying cash from agricultural sale proceeds and possessing liquor with val...