Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Show Cause Notice Under Section 59 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 Must Afford Meaningful Hearing Before Externment Under Section 56.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 14
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Rajesh Jiwan Jangle, a businessman running a hotel and owning a godown in Nagpur, challenged an externment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police and confirmed by the Divisional Commissioner. The petitioner claimed he was falsely prosecuted by police on suspicion. A show cause notice under Section 59 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 was issued on 15.3.2017 for proposed action under Section 56(1)(a)(b). The petitioner alleged that he went to the office of respondent no.2 with witnesses to submit his explanation, but the officer was absent on multiple occasions, and thus no opportunity of hearing was given before forming the opinion to extern. The court considered whether the externment order was sustainable without a proper hearing. The petitioner argued that the failure to provide a hearing violated principles of natural justice. The respondents did not contest the factual assertion. The court held that the externment order was passed in violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not afforded a reasonable opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the court quashed the externment order and the appellate order, allowing the writ petition.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Externment - Natural Justice - Section 56(1)(a)(b) read with Section 59 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Show cause notice must be followed by a genuine opportunity of hearing - Petitioner alleged that he visited the office of the authority multiple times but the officer was absent, resulting in no hearing - Held that failure to provide an opportunity vitiates the externment order (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the externment order passed under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 is sustainable when the petitioner was not afforded a proper opportunity of hearing as required under Section 59 of the Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the externment order No.04 of 2017 dated 10.4.2017 passed by respondent no.3 and the appellate order in Appeal No.13 of 2017 passed by respondent no.1.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Externment order
  • Show cause notice
  • Opportunity of hearing
  • Bombay Police Act
  • 1951
  • Sections 56 and 59
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (11) 183

Criminal Writ Petition No.599 of 2017

2017-11-30

R. K. Deshpande, M.G. Giratkar

Mr. Akash B. Moon for Petitioner, Mr. S.S. Doifode, A.P.P. for Respondents/State

Rajesh s/o. Jiwan Jangle

State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition challenging externment order

Remedy Sought

Quashing of externment order and appellate order

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed he was not given opportunity of hearing before externment

Previous Decisions

Externment order No.04 of 2017 dated 10.4.2017 passed by Deputy Commissioner of Police; Appeal No.13 of 2017 dismissed by Divisional Commissioner

Issues

Whether the externment order under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 is valid when the petitioner was not afforded a proper opportunity of hearing as required under Section 59.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that he went to the office of respondent no.2 with witnesses to furnish explanation but the officer was absent, hence no hearing was given. Petitioner submitted that he is a businessman and falsely prosecuted by police on suspicion.

Ratio Decidendi

An externment order under Section 56 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 must be preceded by a proper opportunity of hearing as mandated by Section 59. Failure to provide such an opportunity violates principles of natural justice and renders the order invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

It is submitted that the petitioner went to the Office of respondent no.2 along with witnesses to furnish his explanation to the charges. However, respondent no.2 was not present. Petitioner time to time went to his Office, but he was not present. Therefore, no opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner before forming an opinion.

Procedural History

Show cause notice under Section 59 of Bombay Police Act issued on 15.3.2017; externment order No.04 of 2017 passed on 10.4.2017 by Deputy Commissioner of Police; appeal against said order dismissed by Divisional Commissioner in Appeal No.13 of 2017; petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.599 of 2017 before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Police Act, 1951: 56(1)(a)(b), 59
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Show Cause Notice Under Section 59 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 Must Afford Meaningful Hearing Before Externment Under Section 56.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Senior Citizens' Maintenance Case — Gift Deed Set Aside for Failure to Provide Basic Amenities. Section 23 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 interpreted liberally to protect senior ci...