Search Results for "Karnataka Civil Services Rules 2006"

764 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 764 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Legality of Termination of Backdoor Appointments in Nagpur Municipal Corporation. Court Considers Earlier Inquiry Report Finding Bogus Selections and Directs Action Against Irregular Appointments.

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by twelve former employees of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, whose serv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Appeals Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Murder Case. Evidence of Sole Eyewitness and Medical Evidence Required Re-appreciation in Light of Trial Court's Findings.

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard two criminal appeals against the acquittal of six accused persons by the Trial Court in a case of al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Board's Appeal in Land Acquisition Dispute — Directs Payment of Allotment Rate Instead of Development Cost. The court held that the Board's policy of charging allotment rate for industrial plots is valid and the writ court erred in directing payment of development cost.

The Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (Board) appealed against the order of a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.24701-702/2012, which directed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Challenging Small Causes Court Jurisdiction in Eviction Suit Where Tenant Denies Landlord-Tenant Relationship. Denial of Jural Relationship Ousts Jurisdiction of Small Causes Court Under Section 8(1) of Karnataka Small Causes Courts Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Sri Pankaj L Kothari, was the sole defendant in a small causes case (S.C.1845/12) filed by the respondent, Sri T.K. Nagaraj, seeking e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...