Search Results for "tender condition interpretation"

571 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 571 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Delayed Possession Case, Upholds Allottees' Right to Interest. Section 18 of RERA Overrides Section 55 of Contract Act; Acceptance of Delayed Possession Does Not Waive Right to Compensation.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Minutes of Meeting Converted Force Majeure Clause into Assured Return Mechanism, Interpreting Clauses 3.4.19 and 3.7.2 of Construction Agreement. Appeal Challenges Arbitral Interpretation That State Must Compensate for Any Toll Collection Drop Exceeding 20%.

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a dispute concerning a build-operate-transfer (BOT) contract for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005

The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contractual Dispute Over Withheld Payments. Court upholds award directing release of Rs. 2,66,48,000 with 8% interest, finding no patent illegality or perversity under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 2 March 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026

The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act but Reduces Damages — LIC vs NIC Dispute Over Flat Occupancy. The court held that the Appellate Authority's reduction of damages and stay on execution pending High Power Committee decision was justified, but eviction order was valid.

The dispute involves two public sector undertakings: Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), the owner of a flat, and National Insurance Company Lt...