Search Results for "muddemal"

901 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 901 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Weak Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay Namdeo Gaikwad, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Umabai, and sentenced...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification. Identification of accused in darkness based on torchlight held insufficient to sustain conviction under Sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Akola in Sessions Trial No. 35/2015 dated 05.03.2018, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Hostile Witness and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt, and the trial court's acquittal was not perverse.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of accused nos. 1 to 4 (respondents) by the trial court in a murder case. The prosecuti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony. Trial Court's Use of Vulgar Language in Recording Testimony Strongly Deprecated.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment dated 14/08/2012 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, in Sessions Case No.19 of 2010, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Land Dispute Case. Court confirms life imprisonment for appellant under Section 302 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

The case involves three criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Sessions Trial No.50 of 2016. The appellan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Improper Investigation. Conviction under SC/ST Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove caste-based insult and arson beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Aba @ Munjaba s/o Rajabhau Giri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Ambajogai, in Special Case No. 3 of 2013 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case Based on Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for setting wife on fire after quarrel over daughter's marriage upheld as dying declarations were consistent and reliable.

The appellant, Suresh Babu Giri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for the murder of his wife Bebibai under Section 302 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The case pertains to the murder of a woman named Sakhubai, who was allegedly killed by her husband Shamrao Telgote (appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in POCSO Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration Lead to Upholding of Acquittal Under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused (XYZ) for offences under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Se...