Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case Based on Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for setting wife on fire after quarrel over daughter's marriage upheld as dying declarations were consistent and reliable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 157
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Suresh Babu Giri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for the murder of his wife Bebibai under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case was that on 18 September 2012, around 10:30 to 11:00 p.m., the appellant, after consuming liquor, quarreled with his wife over the marriage of their daughter. He poured kerosene on her and set her on fire with a matchstick. The deceased was taken to the hospital where she succumbed to her injuries. The appellant appealed against the conviction. The main legal issue was whether the dying declarations made by the deceased were reliable and sufficient to convict the appellant. The court analyzed the dying declarations recorded by the Executive Magistrate and the police, and found them consistent and credible. The court also considered the testimony of the deceased's son and daughter, who were eyewitnesses, and the medical evidence. The court held that the dying declarations were voluntary, truthful, and corroborated by other evidence. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Dying Declaration - Section 302 IPC, Section 32 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Conviction based on dying declaration - The appellant was convicted for murdering his wife by pouring kerosene and setting her on fire. The court examined the reliability of multiple dying declarations and found them consistent and trustworthy. Held that the dying declarations, corroborated by medical evidence and oral testimony, were sufficient to uphold the conviction (Paras 1-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declarations of the deceased are reliable and sufficient to sustain the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • Section 32 Indian Evidence Act
  • 1872
  • reliability of dying declaration
  • conviction based on dying declaration
  • Section 302 IPC
  • murder by burning
  • circumstantial evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (07) 9

Criminal Appeal No.88 of 2021

2021-07-28

V.K. Jadhav, S.G. Dige

Mr. S K Adkine (for appellant), Mr. S P Deshmukh (APP for respondent)

Suresh Babu Giri

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murdering his wife by pouring kerosene and setting her on fire

Previous Decisions

Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad convicted appellant on 11.9.2015 in Sessions Case No.118 of 2013

Issues

Whether the dying declarations are reliable and sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 IPC

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that dying declarations were not reliable and there were contradictions State argued that dying declarations were consistent and corroborated by other evidence

Ratio Decidendi

Dying declarations, if found to be voluntary, truthful, and consistent, can form the sole basis for conviction under Section 302 IPC, especially when corroborated by medical evidence and eyewitness testimony.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad dated 11.9.2015 in Sessions Case No.118 of 2013 thereby convicting the appellant/accused Suresh s/o Babu Giri for the offence punishable u/s 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 11.9.2015 in Sessions Case No.118 of 2013. He appealed to the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, which reserved judgment on 19.07.2021 and pronounced on 28.07.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Remands Case for Fresh Consideration. Lower Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Improper Appreciation of Evidence Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Were Undated, Not Read Over, and Recorded in Marathi While De...