Search Results for "management wrong"

1510 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1510 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Vice-Chancellor of Pune University; Holds No Violation of Prescribed Qualifications. Court Finds that Petitioner Failed to Prove That Incumbent Lacked Essential Qualifications Under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Dr. Prabhakar J. Lavakare challenging the appointment of Respondent No.4, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Doctor in Medical Negligence Case Due to Lack of Gross Negligence. Death During Surgery Not Sufficient for Criminal Liability Under Section 304A IPC Without Proof of Recklessness.

The case arises from the death of Prakash Parekh, a young man who underwent a surgical procedure performed by Dr. Anil Pinto on 20/02/1984. The compla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Videocon Industries Against Winding Up Order for Non-Payment of Guarantee Debt to Italian Bank. Patronage Letter Held to Be a Guarantee Under Indian Contract Act, 1872, and Claim Not Time-Barred.

The case involves an appeal by Videocon Industries Limited against an order of the Company Judge directing payment of Rs.259.73 crores to Intesa Sanpa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Regularisation of Encroachment on Communidade Land in Public Interest Litigation. Administrative Tribunal's Order Regularising Unauthorised Construction by Minister Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Communidade Land Protection Laws.

The petitioner, an advocate and public spirited citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the order of the Administrative Tribunal (resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...