WRIT PETITION NOs. 4198 2005, 564 2009, 804 2002,
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "employer's son"
573 result(s) found
Found 573 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Compensation Claim for Deceased Passenger in Railways Act Case — Bona Fide Passenger Status Established Despite Missing Ticket. The Court held that circumstantial evidence, including police inquest report and witness testimony, can prove passenger status under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.
1 Jan 2026The appellant, Lata, wife of the deceased Chandrakant Thakkar, filed a claim for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989 after her husband fell from...
- 112
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preliminary Investigation Report and FIR in Lokayukta Corruption Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 PC Act. Investigation Initiated Without Valid Sanction Against Public Servant is Void Ab Initio.
22 Aug 2016The petitioner, Sri C. Mruthyunjayaswamy, a Chief Engineer in the National Highways department, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of th...
- 91
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Suit Appeal in Hindu Succession Act Case — Widow Entitled to Share in Joint Family Property. Daughter-in-law's claim for share in deceased husband's assets upheld under Section 8 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, with court directing partition of properties including insurance and retirement benefits.
28 Mar 2014The appellant, Smt. Kamalabai, widow of Laxman Kshatri, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of properties left by her husband, includin...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for stabbing death confirmed as prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt through credible eyewitnesses and consistent medical evidence.
6 Jul 2026The appellant, Sagar Shankar Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, for the murder of Babu @ Rajesh Ganesh Gupta under Sectio...
- 22
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Regular Second Appeal Against First Appellate Order Setting Aside Decree for Name and Caste Correction. First Appellate Court Set Aside Trial Court Decree Holding Suit Not Maintainable, and the High Court Examines Jurisdictional Questions.
25 Jun 2026The litigation arose when a minor plaintiff, through his father as guardian, filed a suit seeking a declaration that his correct name was 'Aarush' and...
- 22
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal, Upholding First Appellate Court Decision on Non-Maintainability of Suit for Name and Caste Correction. Civil Suit for Correction of Name and Caste in School Records Barred Under Section 9 CPC and Jurisdiction Vests with District Caste Verification Committee.
25 Jun 2026The dispute arose from a suit filed by a minor plaintiff seeking correction of his name from 'Shahid' to 'Aarush' and caste from 'Muslim' to 'Hindu Go...
- 26
High Court
Madras High Court Adjudicated a Commercial Suit for Recovery of Chit Maturity Amount Against a Partnership Firm and Partners. The plaintiff claimed the maturity value based on an acknowledgment of liability and promissory estoppel, while the defendants raised a prior suit for injunction and accounts.
21 Jan 2025The plaintiff, a construction company, filed a commercial suit against a partnership firm (first defendant) and its partners (defendants 2 to 6) for r...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Separate Seniority Lists for Graduate and Diploma Engineers in Nagpur Municipal Corporation. Petitioners Claim Seniority Should Be Based on Date of Joining Junior Engineer Post, Not Educational Qualification.
6 Jan 2014The matter involved four writ petitions filed by employees of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation challenging the seniority list of Graduate Engineers (A...
- 272
High Court
Bombay High Court pronounces judgment on Letters Patent appeals in oppression and mismanagement case under Companies Act, 1956 — dispute over diversion of Contship agency business. The Court examined whether directors' diversion of business opportunity amounted to oppression and breach of fiduciary duty under Sections 397, 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.
31 Mar 2006The appeals arose from a dispute between the Puri Group and the Sippy Group, both holding equal shares and equal directorships in two private Indian s...
- 30
