Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for stabbing death confirmed as prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt through credible eyewitnesses and consistent medical evidence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sagar Shankar Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, for the murder of Babu @ Rajesh Ganesh Gupta under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 20,000. The incident occurred on 18-19 September 2020 when both the deceased and the appellant, who worked as labourers together, returned from Amravati. On the morning of 19 September, the deceased went to work and was attacked by the appellant with a knife. The mother of the deceased, Shanta Ganesh Gupta, witnessed the attack and raised an alarm. Other eyewitnesses, including Dheeraj Babusingh Thakur, Akash Bajrangsingh Thakur, and Rakesh Talwade, also saw the incident and attempted to intervene, but the appellant fled after throwing the knife into a stream. The police arrived, found the deceased dead, and registered a case based on the mother's complaint. The trial court convicted the appellant, leading to this appeal. The appellant argued that the eyewitnesses were not credible and that the medical evidence did not support the prosecution's case. The High Court examined the evidence, including the testimony of the eyewitnesses and the postmortem report, and found that the prosecution had established the guilt of the appellant beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the eyewitnesses were consistent and their testimony was corroborated by medical evidence. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 IPC - Conviction based on eyewitness testimony - Appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC - The appellant challenged his conviction and life sentence for murdering the deceased by stabbing. The court examined the credibility of eyewitnesses and medical evidence. Held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through consistent eyewitness accounts and medical evidence corroborating the cause of death. The appeal was dismissed. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Case No. 50/2021 are upheld.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Eyewitness testimony
  • Medical evidence
  • Credibility of witnesses
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Life imprisonment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 169

Criminal Appeal No. 745 of 2024

2026-07-06

Urmila Joshi Phalke, Nivedita P. Mehta

2026:BHC-NAG:8456-DB

Mr. T.A. Mirza for the Appellant, Mrs. S.S. Dhote for the Respondent/State

Sagar Shankar Kamble

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction and sentence for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court.

Filing Reason

The appellant was convicted for the murder of Babu @ Rajesh Ganesh Gupta and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Previous Decisions

The trial court (Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha) convicted the appellant on 31.08.2024 in Sessions Case No. 50/2021.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence of eyewitnesses and medical evidence.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the eyewitnesses were not credible and the medical evidence did not support the prosecution's case. The respondent/State argued that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through consistent eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable when the prosecution proves its case beyond reasonable doubt through credible eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical evidence. The court found no reason to interfere with the trial court's findings.

Judgment Excerpts

By this appeal, the appellant challenges the judgment and order of sentence passed in Sessions Case No.50/2021 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha dated 31.08.2024 by which the accused Sagar Shankar Kamble is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code...

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha on 31.08.2024 in Sessions Case No. 50/2021 for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No. 745 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was reserved on 12.06.2026 and pronounced on 06.07.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for stabbing death confirmed as prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt through credible eyewi...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeals in Bank Suit Rejection Case — Plaint Rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action. Appellant's Suits for Declaration and Injunction Against Bank's Auction Notice Held Barr...