Search Results for "building contractor"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "building contractor"

762 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 762 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Injunction Bank Guarantee Invocation in Development Dispute. Court holds that bank guarantee is an independent contract and injunction can only be granted on grounds of fraud or irretrievable injustice, not mere breach of underlying contract.

12 Aug 2020

The appeal arose from a commercial suit where the appellant, Kryshnajay Developers Pvt. Ltd., sought a temporary injunction to restrain the respondent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeals in Contract Dispute Over Development of Land — Holds That Work Order Constitutes a Contract and That Termination Without Notice Is Invalid Under Specific Relief Act, 1963. The court also held that the suit for damages was barred by limitation as the cause of action arose in 1991 and the suit was filed in 1999.

6 May 2011

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 13-8-2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division at Mapusa in...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Constitutional Validity of Goa Public Men's Corruption Act — Dismisses Petitions Challenging Commission's Powers. The Court held that the Act is within the legislative competence of the State and does not violate fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, 20, 21, and 311 of the Constitution.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of the Goa Pub...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Constitutional Validity of Goa Public Men's Corruption (Investigation and Inquiries) Commission Act, 1988 — Dismisses Petitions Challenging Commission's Powers and Composition. The Court held that the Act does not violate Articles 14, 19, 21, or 311 of the Constitution and that the Commission is a fact-finding body with no adjudicatory powers.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of the Goa Pub...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Withholding of Payment Due to Complaints by Ex-Employee. Unilateral Withholding of Payment Without Contractual Authority or Opportunity of Hearing Violates Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of Constitution.

8 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Mahimtura Consultants Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in consultancy engineering and project management, was awarded a contract by the Pi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Despite Completion of Work. Clause 21 of Agreement dated 05/09/1988 constitutes valid arbitration agreement under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Sep 2016

The petitioners, Srinivasa Construction (a registered partnership firm) and its partners, filed a petition under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitrat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Directions in Suo Motu PIL on Building Collapse in Nagpur. Court emphasizes strict compliance with Development Control Rules and accountability of planning authorities.

3 Jul 2017

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, took suo motu cognizance of a news item published in 'The Hitwada' dated 19.12.2006 regarding the collapse of a n...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Cross-Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matter — Power of Appellate Court Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Examined. The Court held that an appellate court under Section 37 cannot remand a Section 34 petition for fresh hearing but must decide the appeal on merits.

8 Jul 2024

The dispute arose from a development agreement concerning a slum rehabilitation scheme in Mumbai. The appellant, Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Regulation Zone Notification for Versova Mangroves — No Violation of CRZ Norms Found. Court held that the impugned notification dated 18.01.2019 was issued after due consideration of all relevant factors and did not violate the CRZ Notification, 2011.

4 Dec 2020

The present Public Interest Litigation was filed by 14 petitioners, including residents of Versova, Mumbai, and the Jai Bharat Cooperative Housing Soc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

43 44 45 46 47

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)