Search Results for "arbitrary scheme"

2672 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2672 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Technical Bid in Public Tender. Court upholds Tender Evaluation Committee's decision that petitioner failed to meet essential eligibility condition regarding submission of work completion certificate for similar work.

The petitioner, Dinesh Gopal Keny, a registered Class IA contractor with over three decades of experience, challenged the rejection of his technical b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Retired Employees Challenging Cut-off Date for Triple Benefit Scheme. Cut-off Date of 31.08.2010 Based on Cabinet Decision Held Not Arbitrary and Not Violative of Article 14.

The appellants were retired teaching and non-teaching employees of deficit grant minority colleges in Bihar. They challenged the cut-off date of 31.08...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Freedom Fighter's Pension Claim Under Swatantra Sainik Sanman Pension Scheme 1980 for Goa Liberation Movement Phase II Participants. The court held that the cut-off date of 1/08/2002 for pension eligibility was arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Shri Sitakant S. Dubhashi, claimed to be a noted freedom fighter who participated in the liberation movement of Goa, Daman and Diu Pha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Exemption Order Under ULC Act Due to Reservation in Development Plan — Petitioner Failed to Implement Scheme Despite Exemption, No Ground for Modification After Repeal of ULC Act.

The petitioner, Smt. Sitabai Ramchandra Lonkar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 13th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Cross Petitions on Industrial Court's Decision Regarding Permanency of Temporary Municipal Workers. The Determination Turns on Compliance with BPMC Act and MRTU & PULP Act, Including Model Standing Order 4C.

The matter involved cross writ petitions arising from a complaint filed by temporary workers of Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation under the Mahara...