Search Results for "Section 13(2) Notice"

1270 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1270 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Maintainability of Composite Appeal Against Common Judgment in Two Civil Suits. Composite Appeal Filed with Certified Copies of Both Decrees and Payment of Court Fees for Two Appeals Is Maintainable Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from two civil suits filed by the same plaintiff before the trial court. The first suit, O.S. No.14 of 1986, sought a declaration th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Filed by Developer and Flat Purchasers Seeking Quashing of Stop Work Notice and Grant of Occupation Certificate. Dispute Between Developer and Landowner Leads to Stalling of Occupation Certificate for Completed Wing D.

The matter before the Bombay High Court arose from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The first petition, Writ P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against Acquittal in Gold Smuggling Case — Retracted Confession and Lack of Independent Witnesses Lead to Acquittal Confirmation. Section 108 Customs Act statement retracted on ground of coercion and not corroborated by independent evidence, hence not reliable.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against the acquittal of Narendra Ratanchand Jain (respondent no.1) for offences under the Customs A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Cancellation of Land Allotment After 13 Years — Delay Unreasonable Despite No Limitation Prescribed Under UPZALR Act. Allottees Who Constructed Houses and Resided for 13 Years Have Legitimate Expectation; Suo Moto Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Period.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had upheld the cancellation of land allotment to the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Under Section 37 Against Order Quashing Arbitral Award on Limitation. Single Judge's order set aside arbitral award as claim was found barred by limitation, limited to determination under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Bombay High Court against the order dated 10 April 2024...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Convicts Directors for Default in Filing Statement of Affairs Under Section 454(5) of Companies Act, 1956 — Failure to Submit Statement Despite Repeated Court Orders and Notices Constitutes Offence Without Reasonable Excuse.

The Official Liquidator of M/s. Geeta Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. filed a complaint under Section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 against four accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders Dismissing Interlocutory Applications. The Petitions, Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, Seek Certiorari Against Orders Dated 18.06.2025 in Various KID Proceedings.

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard and reserved judgment on a batch of writ petitions filed by BDK Valves Private Limited, a company in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Customs Appeal, Upholds Confiscation of Cosmetics Imported Through Non-Notified Port. Import of Cosmetics Through Marmagoa Port Violates Rule 133 Read with Rule 43-A of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, as Cosmetics Are Not Exempted Under Rule 132 and Schedule D.

The Commissioner of Customs, Goa, filed an appeal under the Customs Act, 1962, against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.

The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.891 OF 2010

The case arises from arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards. The peti...