Search Results for "Revision power"

4368 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4368 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Petition Against Execution of Consent Decree in Money Suit. Compromise Decree Without Specified Amount Held Executable as Joint Memo Contained Mechanism for Determining Amount Due.

The revision petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased defendant S.K.Krishnan, challenged the order of the executing court in E.P.No.3975 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka adjourns writ petition filed by employees of Bharat Electronics Limited for preliminary hearing; no final order passed. Petition seeks mandamus and certiorari based on allegations of discrimination and violation of service rules.

The writ petition was filed by 52 employees of Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL), a Government of India enterprise under the Ministry of Defence. They ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Eviction Case for Unlawful Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Tenants failed to show error apparent on face of record in revision order confirming eviction decree under Bombay Rent Act.

The petitioners, who were the defendants in the original eviction suit, filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Executability of Compromise Decree in Eviction Suit under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The court considers whether a compromise that does not refer to specific eviction grounds creates a fresh tenancy requiring new proceedings.

The respondent-landlord filed a suit against the petitioner-tenants seeking eviction under Section 16(1)(e)(ii) and (g) of the Maharashtra Rent Contro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...