Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

1939 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1939 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Commercial Arbitration Application Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Clause 32 of Work Order Held to Contain Valid Arbitration Agreement Despite Ambiguous Wording.

25 Oct 2018

The applicant, M/s. Jay Bhagwati Construction Co., a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Injunction Application in Redevelopment Dispute and Holds Civil Suit Not Barred by Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Developer's Claim for Specific Performance of Development Agreement Against Co-operative Housing Society Held Maintainable as Developer Is Not a Member Under Section 91, and Transaction Not Subject to Restrictions Under Sections 43, 44, or 45.

13 Jul 2016

The suit was filed by a partnership firm of developers, Maya Developers, against the Azad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, seeking s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Joint Venture Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Agreement. Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked for disputes arising from Joint Venture Agreement dated 28th March, 2007.

6 May 2022

The applicant, M/s. Atul & Arkade Realty, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitrat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka [Outcome Not Available] in Criminal Petition to Quash FIR Under Sections 406, 417, 418, 420, 465 Indian Penal Code, Involving Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Court Examined Whether Allegations Constituted Criminal Offences or Mere Civil Breach, Emphasizing Need for Dishonest Intention at Inception for Cheating.

3 Feb 2020

The matter involved a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash FIR No. 168/2018 registered at Hig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Interim Measures in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act, Citing Public Interest in Airport Development. Termination of Determinable Contract Not Stayed as Injunction Would Amount to Specific Performance Barred Under Specific Relief Act.

23 Aug 2013

The case arose from a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited ...

Supreme Court

“Mandatory Injunction vs Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 41(h) Specific Relief Act (2026 INSC 61)”“Cloud on Title & Possession: Why Injunction Suit Fails

15 Jan 2026

In Sanjay Paliwal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., the plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to remove a wall allegedly blocking access to their l...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Cross Appeals Against Temporary Injunction Order in Suit by Co-operative Housing Society. Developer and Land Owner Challenge Order Restraining Construction and Use of FSI in Suit Alleging Breach of Development Obligations.

7 Apr 2016

The dispute arose from a development project known as Dosti Flamingos in Sewri, Mumbai. M/s. Dosti Corporation, a partnership firm, acted as developer...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in MOU Dispute — Clause Providing for 'Alternative' Arbitration by Mutual Consent Not a Binding Arbitration Agreement. The Court held that Clause 10 of the MOU did not contain a binding arbitration agreement as it made arbitration contingent on future mutual consent and was not mandatory, thereby rejecting the application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Sep 2014

The Applicant filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator to resolve ...

High Court

High Court Quashes Termination of Railway Contract as Arbitrary and Violative of Natural Justice. Writ Petition Maintainable Despite Arbitration Clause Under Article 226 of Constitution of India, as Termination Notices Dated 13.11.2025 and 02.12.2025 Were Issued Without Adequate Hearing and With Sufficient Time Remaining for Completion.

27 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a registered partnership firm, Petitioner, challenging the termination of its contract with Central Railway authorities for const...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Corporate Insolvency Case Involving Land Ownership and Development Rights Dispute. Court Upholds NCLAT Order Protecting Licensee's Possession of 10000 Sq.Ft. While Preserving Corporate Debtor's Development Rights as Intangible Assets Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

14 Mar 2023

The appeals arose from a common order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dismissing two independent appeals filed against an order of the ...

43 44 45 46 47

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)